36.63, Calls: Cognitive Science, Linguistic Theories, Semantics, Syntax, Typology / France

The LINGUIST List linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Fri Jan 10 23:05:07 UTC 2025


LINGUIST List: Vol-36-63. Fri Jan 10 2025. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 36.63, Calls: Cognitive Science, Linguistic Theories, Semantics, Syntax, Typology / France

Moderator: Steven Moran (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Managing Editor: Justin Fuller
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Steven Franks, Joel Jenkins, Daniel Swanson, Erin Steitz
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Editor for this issue: Erin Steitz <ensteitz at linguistlist.org>

================================================================


Date: 10-Jan-2025
From: Giulia Mazzola [giulia.mazzola at ncl.ac.uk]
Subject: The Syntax and Semantics of Perception: Workshop at 58th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea


Full Title: The Syntax and Semantics of Perception: Workshop at 58th
Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea
Short Title: SLE 58 CauRPe workshop

Date: 26-Aug-2025 - 29-Aug-2025
Location: University of Bordeaux Montaigne, France
Contact Person: Michelle Sheehan
Meeting Email: michelle.sheehan1 at newcastle.ac.uk

Call Deadline: 15-Jan-2025

Second Call for Papers:
After the official acceptance of the workshop proposal, we invite
submissions for the 58th SLE Meeting in Bordeaux (max. 500 words) in
EasyChair before January 15, 2025, via:
https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=sle2025
Full Workshop Description:
https://societaslinguistica.eu/sle2025/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2024/12/The-syntax-and-semantics-of-perception.pdf
Short Workshop Description:
Perception verbs express human interactions with the world via the
five major senses: sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste. Either the
observer or the observee can function as a verbal subject, and many
verbs alternate between these two options (in English and other
languages – (Viberg 1984; 2001)):
1) a. Sam felt the cloth.
b. The cloth felt soft.
Amongst verbs which take the observer as subject, another important
distinction is that between activity (2a) vs. experience (2b) (Viberg
1984; 2001):
2) a. Sara {watched/was watching} the birds.
b. Sara {saw/#was seeing} the birds.
In many cases, activity/experience verbs can also take clausal
complements of different kinds, with complementation type linked to
the distinction between direct and indirect perception (Dik &
Hengeveld 1991).
3) a. I saw him walk(ing) down the street.[Direct perception of a
state of affairs/event]
b. I saw that he had been crying. [Indirect perception of
propositional content]
c. I see that you will be graduating next year. [Reception of the
propositional content of a speech act]
The use of a gerund in (3b) famously conveys atelicity (Kirsner &
Thompson 1976; Mittwoch 1990; Felser 1999).
Languages other than English make what seem to be similar distinctions
but often in language-specific ways. In languages with limited/no
non-finite embedding, direct perception is conveyed by other means.
For example, Fijian uses nominalisations (as opposed to clausal
complements) to convey what appears to be direct perception (Dik &
Hengeveld (1991: 242, citing Dixon 1988: 38, 268); Japanese uses the
particle –no (as opposed to –koto) (Dik & Hengeveld (1991: 242, citing
Kuno 1973: 220); and Russian uses the complememntiser kak (as opposed
to čto) (Dik & Hengeveld (1991: 242, citing Noonan (1985: 131).
At this workshop, we hope to bring together people working on the
syntax and semantics of perception verbs in diverse languages in any
theoretical framework, with a particular focus on clausal
complementation patterns and their relationship to direct vs. indirect
perception.
We welcome papers describing and/or analyzing the syntax of perception
verbs in any language(s), especially those focusing on clausal
complementation, potentially in comparison with other verb classes
(e.g. causatives) addressing the following /related questions:
I. Sense-modality and morphosyntactic complexity
1) Does the sense-modality hierarchy regulate morphosyntactic
complexity crosslinguistically?
2) Are there differences across different sensorial modalities?
II. Complementation patterns
3) What clausal complements are possible cross-linguistically and why?
4) Do all perception verbs accept all kinds of clausal complements?
5) What kinds of meanings are associated with different complement
types?
III. Semantic shifts and typology
6) What are the attested semantic shifts in this domain beyond
Indo-European languages?
7) Are there interactions between typological lexicalisation patterns
and clausal complementation patterns?
8) Are there patterns of language change? How do different clausal
complements emerge? Does their change follow the typological
predictions?
We encourage submissions from typology and/or comparative studies, as
well as language specific case studies from all kinds of theoretical
approaches, discussing the lexicalization and complementation of
perception verbs, their semantic shifts and/or diachronic changes, as
well
as the syntax-semantics mapping of their complements, especially from
understudied languages/language families.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

********************** LINGUIST List Support ***********************
Please consider donating to the Linguist List to support the student editors:

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=87C2AXTVC4PP8

LINGUIST List is supported by the following publishers:

Cambridge University Press http://www.cambridge.org/linguistics

Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/

Elsevier Ltd http://www.elsevier.com/linguistics

John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/

Language Science Press http://langsci-press.org

Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/

Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke (LOT) http://www.lotpublications.nl/

Wiley http://www.wiley.com


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-36-63
----------------------------------------------------------



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list