LL-L "Etymology" 2002.12.05 (08) [E]
Lowlands-L
admin at lowlands-l.net
Thu Dec 5 19:44:23 UTC 2002
======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 05.DEC.2002 (08) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
Web Site: <http://www.lowlands-l.net> Email: admin at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: <http://www.lowlands-l.net/rules.htm>
Posting Address: <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Server Manual: <http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html>
Archive: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html>
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or
sign off at <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic
V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================
From: Theo Homan theohoman at yahoo.com
Subject: Etymology
Could you tell me something about Dutch 'pink'?
There has been some interesting talking now about
'celtic' counting in english dialects.
This brings me to Dutch 'pink'; one of my old
favourites.
Here we go:
Dutch 'pink' means 'little finger'.
Origin of this word is not known [to me, that is].
But always I liked to understand this word 'pink' as
the 'fifth finger'.
[Here you have it connected with the counting-talks.]
But:
understanding 'pink' als '5th finger', means that I
like to see it as an Indo-European word, meaning 'the
fifth'.
The final '-ink' may be linked to Indo-European.
The initial 'p-' may be be linked to Indo-European.
But combining P with INK [as a Germanic construction]
is a trick I am not able to do.
Is 'pink' an I-E fossile?
Or is 'pink' a fossile of a language very much in the
neighbourhood of Old-Germanic, eg. of the language of
the Kaninefates / Canninefates [Kennemers]? And this
is just saying that the language of these Canninefates
was not real Germanic, shame on me!
OK, let us deal with substrates: I like making
theories about substrates, but working with substrates
in practise always turns out to be a mess.
Who helps me out?
And: what is the first evidence of 'pink' in Dutch or
Franconian?
All questions, but no answers, unless you ...
vr.gr.
Theo Homan
==================================END===================================
* Please submit postings to <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
to be sent to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or at
<http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
=======================================================================
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list