LL-L "Grammar" 2004.12.07 (05) [E]
Lowlands-L
lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Wed Dec 8 01:30:26 UTC 2004
======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 07.DEC.2004 (05) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================
From: Steven Hanson <hanayatori at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Grammar
"The sentence was:
> Ask a Bushman that is easy enough with your company to speak freely,
Seriously? Would you say "a Scotsman that...", "a Native American that...",
or "a Canadian that..."? I have my doubts, but, since you are from Hamburg,
sentences like "He wolfed down the hamburger that had fallen on the floor"
must sound quite natural to you. :-)
Gabriele Kahn
(the moose who roared)"
Yup, indeed you could say "a Scotsman that...", "a Native American that...",
and so on.
----------
From: heather rendall <HeatherRendall at compuserve.com>
Subject: LL-L "Grammar" 2004.12.06 (10) [E]
Message text written by INTERNET:lowlands-l at LOWLANDS-L.NET
>are not so widely used anymore, at least in North America. <
But there again I read just recently that American Publishing houses are
accepting 'I would of' as an alternative to 'I would' ve'
??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! their reasoning :- because people use
it!!!
Heather
PS I hope this was a mis-reporting!
==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list