LL-L "Etymology" 2004.12.30 (02) [E]
Lowlands-L
lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Thu Dec 30 21:54:31 UTC 2004
======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 30.DEC.2004 (02) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================
Onderwerp: 'etymology_white'
Van: "Carl Witzel" <cwitzjr at msn.com>
Hi Ron,
I would like to start a new discussion about the possible similarities
between the IE words _white_ and _wit_ (wise).
The Oxford English dictionary only begins to approach a possible overlap
in meaning or etymology in the two words. Yet in my studies, I see
often either a confusion or a duality in the two words during different
periods. Perhaps in early pre-IE there is a closer connection that
carries through almost unconsciously today?
_wit_: Indo-Eur. _woid-_, _weid-_, _wid-_; 'to see'. OFris. wita, wêt,
*wast, *witon, witen and witath, wiste; (M)LG. wit,
_white_: Indo-Eur. *kwidnos, *kwitnos; 'to be white, bright'; OFris.
hwitt; (M)Du., (M)LG. wit (-tt-):â*vwittaz.
Do I see the Indo-Eur word for 'to see': _wid_ within the Indo-Eur word
for 'white': _kwidnos_?
In English, the word bright is found in common to both. In (M )Du., and
(M )LG., the word is the same, though one is a noun and the other an
adverb. And the conjugations seam too magically mimic each other on
many occasions, almost as if the language is fighting to keep them apart
and distinguishable despite their desire to be the same word.
Certainly there are many words that appear alike, but are not. Yet,
white= pure, bright, and wit = wisdom, bright. They both tend to imply
totality, fullness.
I'd like to hear if anyone has ever studied these two words and arrived
at any conclusions.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards;
Carl
================================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
======================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lowlands-l/attachments/20041230/69391cb6/attachment.htm>
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list