LL-L "Language varieties" 2005.11.19 (03) [E/Papiamentu]
Lowlands-L
lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Sun Nov 20 04:12:25 UTC 2005
======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
=======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 19 November 2005 * Volume 03
=======================================================================
From: Jacqueline Bungenberg de Jong <Dutchmatters at comcast.net>
Subject: LL-L "Language varieties" 2005.11.19 (01) [E/Papiamentu]
Re: Here are a few examples of Dutch words absorbed in Papiamentu
Ron says zuip = English whip.
That is interesting because whip in Dutch is zweep, but there is a closer
cognate in zuip(en) pejorative for to drink. I would expect the old
slavemasters to use zuipen rather than drinken. Oh well, so it goes.
Jacqueline
----------
From: Jacqueline Bungenberg de Jong <Dutchmatters at comcast.net>
Subject: LL-L "Language varieties" 2005.11.19 (02) [E/Papiamentu]
Ron says:
<< it became clear to me that in the
<old days of European supremacy (real and imagined) colonists and their
<helpers, most of whom had little or no education and little or no incentive
<to regard indigenous people as being real human beings (in part to protect
<themselves from compassion), either believed that all "Kanakas" anywhere in
<the world had one type of "primitive" language, or they believed that
<"primitive," "childish" linguae francae were all they deserved or could be
<expected to learn.
Ron, maybe you are assigning worse motives to the "colonists" than is
necessary. People that have to converse with people who do not understand
them usually start with some kind of "desperanto" which leans heavy on
nouns, pointing and mimicry of verbs. And if that works fine.! Unless a
person is a linguistic genius like you must be, learning a language is
difficult. Want to "see" me speak Italian?
----------
From: R. F. Hahn <sassisch at yahoo.com>
Subject: Language varieties
Kunbai, Jacqueline í Ulpi! Ami ta kontento ke esaki tópiko ta interesante pa
bo, tambe ke bo por komprende (hopi di) Papiamentu, Ulpi.
Hi, Jacqueline and Ulpi! I'm happy to see you find this topic interesting,
also that you can understand (much of the) Papiamentu, Ulpi.
Jacqueline:
> Ron says zuip = English whip.
> That is interesting because whip in Dutch is zweep, but there is a closer
> cognate in zuip(en) pejorative for to drink. I would expect the old
> slavemasters to use zuipen rather than drinken. Oh well, so it goes.
I'm afraid _zuip_ really does come from _zweep_ 'whip', 'lash'. Don't be
fooled by the spelling <ui> here. It looks Dutch but isn't, is in fact
pronounced something like [Ui] or [wi].
'To drink' is _bebe_ (cf. Spanish & Portuguese _beber_). I'm not sure there
is a Papiamentu equivalent of Dutch _zuipen_ (also Low Saxon
_supen_/_zoepen_, German _saufen_) 'to drink' (of animals), 'to imbibe
excessively', 'to carouse', 'to be a drunk'. A 'drunk' (Dutch _zuiper_ or
_zuiplap_) is a _buraché_, 'drunkenness' is _buracheria_, _fuma_ is the
adjective 'drunk' (but 'to smoke', Spanish _fumar_, is _huma_), and if you
are as soused as you can possibly be (Dutch _stomdroken_) you are
_stòmburachi_ (nice Dutch-Spanish mix!). (Compare Spanish _borracho_
'drunk' (adj & n), _emborracharse_ 'to get drunk', Ladino (Judeo-Spanish)
_borračo_ 'drunk', _borračéz_ (Spanish _embriaguez_).)
> Ron, maybe you are assigning worse motives to the "colonists" than is
> necessary. People that have to converse with people who do not understand
> them usually start with some kind of "desperanto" which leans heavy on
> nouns, pointing and mimicry of verbs. And if that works fine.! Unless a
> person is a linguistic genius like you must be, learning a language is
> difficult. Want to "see" me speak Italian?
I would certainly give the individual the benefit of the doubt, and I am
well aware that in the _Tempo Doeloe_ (the time of Dutch colonization of
Indonesia) and in fact in all colonizing empires there have always been
Europeans that appreciated indigenous people, languages and cultures, and
there have always been cases of them "going native," much to the chagrin of
their compatriots. I was just sharing the overall impression I received
from reading precontemporary records about general attitudes. Even many,
probably most, of the books of that time that were supposed to teach
Europeans about the cultures of colonized countries contained descriptions
and generalizations that nowadays would be funny if they weren't so sad,
especially passages about "national mentality/character" (which I have seen
discussed in some European publications even in this day and age, e.g., "the
... are a very proud and courageous people") and advice about the way the
"natives" must be handled (usually something well-meaning like "handle them
firmly, yet with kindness"). I invite you to read old textbooks teaching
Asian and African languages. The dialogues tend to tell quite a lot of
stories. Most of them are between Europeans and servants (things like "Why
did you not tell me you broke the vase, Mwaka?", "I need you to go to the
market and buy the items I drew on this list, and you must not dawdle this
time.", "Call Sarish to my drawing room this very instant, for he failed to
brush my riding boots!")
Language learning ability and human relations and attitudes aside, my
hypothesis is that there had been migrating *traditions* of contact language
creation, traditions that came to be spread mostly by Europeans and by
intercolonial migration and communication, traditions that may at least in
part explain the similarities between the various pidgins and creoles. From
the little I know about Portuguese-, Spanish-, French- and Russian-based
contact languages (except trade pidgins like Russonorse) I can tell that
there seem to be similar if not identical indications. Such contact
languages were probably considered very convenient among the Europeans
because they were relatively easy to learn and they could be used in more
than one place, hence greatly facilitating communication with ordinary
subjects within the whole of a given empire, certainly in the beginning,
before general education came to be established and the colonizers'
languages came to be taught everywhere.
Regards,
Reinhard/Ron
==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
======================================================================
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list