LL-L "History" 2007.04.05 (03) [E]
Lowlands-L List
lowlands.list at gmail.com
Thu Apr 5 18:43:33 UTC 2007
=======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands.list at gmail.com
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/rules.php
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org - lowlands.list at gmail.com
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv at listserv.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
Administration: lowlands.list at gmail.com or sassisch at yahoo.com
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
=======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L - 05 April 2007 - Volume 03
========================================================================
From: Kevin Caldwell <kevin.caldwell1963 at verizon.net>
Subject: LL-L "History" 2007.04.05 (02) [E]
It's my understanding that the use of American Indian code talkers was
fairly successful. In World War I, they were mainly just a few Choctaw, but
there was a pretty large program in the Pacific Theater of World War II that
used Navajo code talkers. The US didn't use them as much in Europe in World
War II because we were aware the Germans had tried to train people in
American Indian languages.
Kevin Caldwell
From: Sandy Fleming <sandy at scotstext.org>
Subject: LL-L "History" 2007.04.04 (02) [E1
Using a natural language as a code is a notoriously poor strategy, but
it does seem to have found favour with the military at times, and I've
read that it was also used by the Americans in the first world war, who
believed (incorrectly) that the Germans wouldn't be able to understand
American Indian languages.
==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l")
are to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
*********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lowlands-l/attachments/20070405/7b4c8feb/attachment.htm>
More information about the LOWLANDS-L
mailing list