LL-L "Grammar" 2011.03.16 (03) [EN]

[Lowlands-L List]

=====================================================
L O W L A N D S - L - 16 March - Volume 03
lowlands.list at gmail.com - http://lowlands-l.net/
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org
Archive: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-08)
Language Codes: lowlands-l.net/codes.php
============================== =======================



From: R. F. Hahn <sassisch at yahoo.com>

Subject: Language varieties



Dear Lowlanders,

Recently we discussed the not uncommon assumption that morphological
simplification equals deterioration.

As I did on previous occasions, I argued against that assumption, which I
assume to be particularly widespread in cultures and education systems in
which morphologically complex “classical” languages are glorified and thus
come to be deemed superior.

I and others explained that languages are very flexible, that there are
reasons for simplification, and that languages have ways of compensation for
them.

I wonder if any of you can come up with examples in which languages
developed the other way around, namely by acquiring more complex
morphologies with time. I personally can think of no such example.

Thanks.

Regards,
Reinhard/Ron

Seattle, USA



=========================================================
Send posting submissions to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
Send commands (including "signoff lowlands-l") to
listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands.list at gmail.com
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
http://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/group.php?gid=118916521473498
===========================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lowlands-l/attachments/20110316/2ef04ff0/attachment.htm>