ozcoa, ozcohua, izcoa, izcohua

[Michael McCafferty]

Nice to have sources!

Thanks, Joe.

Michael


Quoting "Campbell,  R. Joe" <campbel at indiana.edu>:

> John,
>
>   Unless I'm mistaken, the -ohua forms all come from the Florentine;
> Molina doesn't have -ohua.
>
>   Of course, that doesn't have any weight.  What does weigh is the
> shape of the forms that our sources have.  On the issue of what the
> initial vowel of the stem is, Mol-1 S-N has "neozcoliztli", giving us
> the information that the 'o' is not part of the object prefix; the
> Florentine, Book 11, has 'quimozcooa' (with a 'quim-' prefix), "they
> warm them", corroborating the "o- initial" verb stem hypothesis.
>
>   The 'oa' or 'ohua' question is resolved by a citation in M-2 N-S:
> the preterit of "ninozcoa' is 'oninozco[h]', not 'oninozcouh' (the
> final 'h' of 'oninozcoh') added here as a favor to fray Alonso).
>
>   Oh, the issue of "oa" vs. "ohua" reminds me that I haven't
> regularized the "primary" or "display" spelling for these particular
> entries yet.  Of course, the database will maintain a double
> representation: display (regularized) vs. original.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> Quoting John Sullivan <idiez at me.com>:
>
>> Sorry,
>> 	I should have asked, is it ozcoa, ozcohua, izcoa or izcohua?
>> John
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nahuatl mailing list
>> Nahuatl at lists.famsi.org
>> http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/nahuatl
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nahuatl mailing list
> Nahuatl at lists.famsi.org
> http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/nahuatl
>



_______________________________________________
Nahuatl mailing list
Nahuatl at lists.famsi.org
http://www.famsi.org/mailman/listinfo/nahuatl