CORRECTION expos é Laca (continuation) 2 juillet

[Bridget Copley]

Bonjour, 

Une coquille s'est glissée dans le lien pour le handout. Voilà le bon lien:


http://www.sfl.cnrs.fr/sites/sfl/IMG/pdf/Causesandwishes0610hou.pdf


Cordialement, 
Bridget

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Bridget Copley <bridget.copley at sfl.cnrs.fr>
> Date: June 23, 2010 1:39:08 GMT+02:00
> To: parislinguists at yahoogroupes.fr, sfl-doctorants at services.cnrs.fr, Risc <risc at risc.cnrs.fr>, semantique at yahoogroupes.fr, typoling at services.cnrs.fr
> Subject: [sfl-doctorants] exposé Laca (continuation) 2 juillet
> 
> Le projet "La causalité dans le langage et la cognition"  de la Fédération "Typologie et universaux du langage" (CNRS FR 2559) a le plaisir d'annoncer la deuxième partie d'un exposé : 
> 
> "Causes and wishes : Issues in the temporal configuration of subjunctive clauses," Brenda Laca (SFL)
> 
> 
> Vendredi juin 14:30-16:30, CNRS site Pouchet (59 rue Pouchet, Paris 75017), salle à préciser
> métro Guy Môquet ou Brochant, RER Porte de Clichy (sortie La Jonquière), bus 66
> 
> 
> According to a distinction originally due to Stowell (1993) and subsequently exploited
> by Quer (1998, 2006), “intensional subjunctives” – as opposed to “polarity subjunctives”
> ‐ are lexically selected by a semantic class of matrix predicates which also impose a
> particular  (non-anterior or futurate) temporal orientation on their argument clauses: 
> directives, causatives and volitionals.
> 
> Careful examination of the licit temporal configurations for subjunctive clauses  shows, however, that intensional subjunctives do not conform to a homogeneous pattern: in particular, the
> argument clauses of “volitionals” deviate in manifold ways from the expected temporal
> orientation and give rise in some cases to interpretive effects that parallel those found
> with modal verbs, most notably as regards the distinction between epistemic and counterfactual 
> construals. In this presentation, I explore the possibility of accounting for the behaviour
> of “volitionals” by exploiting their double nature as evaluative propositional attitudes
> and as dispositions to act (Kenny 1963, Heim 1992, Portner 1997).
> 
> 
> handout : http://www.sfl.cnrs.fr/spip/sites/sfl/IMG/pdf/Causesandwishes0610hou.pdf
> 
> lectures suggérées : 
> csli-publications.stanford.edu/pdf/1575862786.pdf
> http://www.springerlink.com/content/lx2l084376030827/
> http://www.umr7023.cnrs.fr/Publications,182.html
> 
> 
> 
> agenda sfl-cause : http://www.sfl.cnrs.fr/spip/Seminaire-2009-2010,864.html
> 
> agenda SFL : http://www.sfl.cnrs.fr/spip/-Agenda-.html
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/parislinguists/attachments/20100623/4abd6091/attachment.htm>