[parislinguists] Fwd: Workshop on Morphosyntactic Triggers of Tone (Call for Papers)
Sophie Wauquier sophie.wauquier@orange.fr [parislinguists]
parislinguists-noreply at yahoogroupes.fr
Tue Feb 3 16:22:17 UTC 2015
-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : Workshop on Morphosyntactic Triggers of Tone (Call for Papers)
Date : Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:34:52 +0100
De : Jochen Trommer <jtrommer at uni-leipzig.de>
Répondre à : Jochen Trommer <jtrommer at uni-leipzig.de>
Pour : mfm at mlist.is.ed.ac.uk
*Call for Papers*
*
*
**
Morphosyntactic Triggers of Tone: New Data and Theories
**
13-14 June 2015
Leipzig
Whereas tone has played a central role in the evolution of phonological
theory (Goldsmith 1976, Pulleyblank 1986, Yip 2002), the channels
by which morphology and syntax trigger tonal reflexes or conversely
restrict tonal alternations are still hardly understood. Firmly
persuaded by Hyman's (2011) dictum that `tone can do everything
segmental or metrical phonology can do' (and more), we think that it is
absolutely essential for linguistics to develop a better understanding
for the empirical richness and the theoretical implications of the
morphosyntax of tone. The goal of this workshop is to provide a forum to
this end which brings together descriptively and theoretically oriented
linguists addressing questions such as:
• How does morphosyntactic structure interact with tonal phonology? Do
syntactic constructions trigger specific tone patterns? Which types of
morphosyntactic boundaries restrict (or are required by) general tonal
alternations? Does opacity in tonal processes correlate with
morphological and syntactic levels of derivation?
• How does tonal featural affixation work morphologically? how are tonal
morphemes linearized? Where do they show systematic patterns of
syncretism and blocking or multiple exponence? What is the distribution
of tonal prefixation and suffixation? Is there a tonal equivalent to
infixation, and how does tonal overwriting work in contrast to additive
tonal morphology?
• What can tonal phenomena teach us about the morphology-syntax
interface? Are tonal alternations at the phrasal level
substantially different from word-level processes? Where do tonal
alternations crosscut the boundaries between word-level morphology and
phrasal syntax?
We invite abstracts for twenty-minute talks with a ten-minute
discussion. We especially encourage contributions which present
original fieldwork (or experimental results), but also highly welcome
submissions that provide new theoretical approaches, establish new
descriptive generalizations, or, simply, bring to the fore relevant data
that have been published, but so far ignored in a the theoretical
discussion.
*Invited Speakers*
• Yuni Kim (University of Manchester)
• Mary Paster (Pomona College)
• Gerrit Dimmendaal (University of Cologne)
*Abstract Submission*
Abstracts must be at most one page long. An optional second page is
permitted for data and references. Abstracts must be anonymous.
Submissions are limited to one individual and one joint abstract per
author, or two joint abstracts per author.
The abstract should be submitted as a PDF attachment and sent to the
following e-mail address:
Eva.Zimmermann[aet]uni-leipzig.de
Please use `Abstract' as the Subject header and include the information
in (1) - (4), which should constitute the body of the message.
Please make sure that all fonts are embedded.
*Author Information*
• Name(s) of author(s)
• Title of talk
• Affiliation(s)
• E-mail address(es)
*Deadline for Submission: * March 31, 2015
*Notification of Acceptance: *April 15, 2015
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/parislinguists/attachments/20150203/0d99e3ad/attachment.htm>
More information about the Parislinguists
mailing list