Marantz 670 vs 660
    Daryn McKenny 
    daryn at ABORIGINALHUNTER.COM
       
    Mon May  9 23:46:18 UTC 2005
    
    
  
Hi Anna,
 
What prices have you been quoted for each model, depending on the
difference someone might know of the 670 cheaper elsewhere.
 
I could try retailers in Newcastle if you want.
 
Regards
 
Daryn McKenny
 
________________________________
From: Linda Barwick [mailto:Linda.Barwick at arts.usyd.edu.au] 
Sent: Monday, 9 May 2005 11:14 PM
To: hjohnson at mail.utexas.edu
Cc: Resource-Network-Linguistic-Diversity at unimelb.edu.au
Subject: Re: Marantz 670 vs 660
 
This reply I tried to send to Anna a few hours ago doesn't seem to have
shown up yet, so I'm resending it: 
 
Dear Anna 
There are a couple of negative articles on the web about the Marantz
PMD660: 
 
see
http://4webresults.com/blog/04-05/marantz-pmd660-portable-recording-devi
ce/ 
 
and also 
 
http://www.rds.com/blogs/doug/index.php/archives/2005/04/14/marantz-pmd6
60-revisited/ 
 
The problem seems to be that they have very noisy mike pre-amps and
unlike the PMD670 it lacks the -20DB 'mike attenuator' switch. 
 
Put this together with its inability to record 24 bit sound and I'd say
as an archivist that it's probably not capable of recording what you
want to an acceptable quality. 
 
PARADISEC has been testing out some other digital recording devices: the
Sony HiMD recorder and the Nagra ARES-P+. We'll post something on this
list shortly, comparing the two. In the meantime we've been quite happy
with our recordings on PMD670 as well as PMD690. 
 
Regards 
Linda 
	From: Anna Ash [mailto:MRALC at westnet.com.au] 
	Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 12:11 AM 
	To: Resource-Network-Linguistic-Diversity at unimelb.edu.au 
	Subject: Marantz 670 vs 660 
	  
	Dear List members, 
	I followed the very useful  discussion on recording equipment,
and we are now trying to decide between the following, available from
Sound Solution in Lismore: 
	Marantz PMD660 
	Marantz PMD670. 
	 
	David Nash noted that the PMD670 is superior in that it can
record 24-bit wav files, but 16-bit MAY be quite adequate. I'd like to
order the 660 as it's cheaper and more portable. Is it adequate for
archival quality? 
	 
	Thanks 
	Anna 
	 
	Anna Ash 
	Linguist 
	Many Rivers Aboriginal Language Centre 
	C/- Muurrbay 
	465 Bellwood Road 
	Nambucca Heads 2448 
	Ph. (02) 65685695 Mob: 0404456992 
	Fax. (02) 65694295 
	 
Dr Linda Barwick 
Senior Research Fellow 
Sydney Conservatorium of Music 
Office: room 235 Transient Building F12 
University of Sydney NSW 2006 
tel +61 2 9351 2002 
fax +61 2 9351 7572 
Linda.Barwick at arts.usyd.edu.au 
 
Director, PARADISEC 
Pacific and Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures 
Sydney Unit, room 238 
Transient Building F12 
University of Sydney NSW 2006 
tel +61 2 9036 9557 
fax +61 2 9351 7572 
http://www.paradisec.org.au 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/resource-network-linguistic-diversity/attachments/20050510/3af395b3/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the Resource-network-linguistic-diversity
mailing list