XSL formatting sorting issues

Tue Mar 1 03:05:10 UTC 2011

Great!

Yes, Oxygen's main strength is surely those red squiggly lines.

I could try explaining those Xpath expressions, but it would turn into an
essay. XSL is weird.

j

On 1 March 2011 13:56, Aidan Wilson <aidan.wilson at unimelb.edu.au> wrote:

> John, your variable xsl element worked. I had to fiddle with what you gave
> me quite a bit, but oxygen just paid for itself giving me all the red
> squiggly lines showing me where every xsl/xml error was. Here's what I came
> up with and below is a sample from the output.
>
>  <xsl:for-each select="Words[Status!='Exclude']/Meanings/Reverse">
>>        <xsl:sort select="."/>
>>        <xsl:sort select="../../Headword"/>
>>        <xsl:variable name="this_word" select="."></xsl:variable>
>>        <xsl:choose>
>>                <xsl:when test="$this_word =
>> ancestor::Words/preceding-sibling::Words[Status!='Exclude']/Meanings/Reverse"></xsl:when>
>>                <xsl:otherwise><br/><strong><xsl:value-of
>> select="."/></strong><br/></xsl:otherwise>
>>        </xsl:choose>
>>        <xsl:value-of select="../../Headword"/><br/>
>> </xsl:for-each>
>>
>
> Output (sample):
>
>> arm
>> lari
>>
>> armlets
>> binbin
>> yerrel
>>
>> armpit
>> wanganyjarri
>>
>> armpit sweat
>> langornen
>>
>> around
>> dabali-ma
>> wirriny-nya
>>
>
> So again, thanks heaps! (I don't quite understand the intricate details of
> ancestor::Words/preceding-sibling blah blah, but that doesn't matter).
>
> -Aidan
>
> --
> Aidan Wilson
>
> PhD Candidate
> Dept of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics
> The University of Melbourne
>
> +61428 458 969
> aidan.wilson at unimelb.edu.au
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Aidan Wilson wrote:
>
>  Thanks for your help, John (et al.). I'll look into that for the
>> de-suplication of reverse elements when I get time.
>>
>> Tom Honeyman had a quicker solution for sorting the entire list of reverse
>> elements with respect to each other, and not within sets of 'Words'
>> elements, and that was to group the two <xsl:for-each together, so instead
>> of:
>> <xsl:for-each select="Words[Status!='Exclude']">
>>        <xsl:for-each select="Meanings/Reverse">
>> I now have just:
>> <xsl:for-each select="Words[Status!='Exclude']/Meanings/Reverse">
>>
>> The way I had it meant I was selecting each word, and within that set,
>> each Reverse element, which was where the sort was having trouble. This
>> selection now works brilliantly.
>>
>> -Aidan
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, John Mansfield wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Aidan,
>>> I will try to help. First I'll discuss your issue about sorting according
>>> to
>>> Reverse elements, then secondly I'll address your "ideal" solution of not
>>> duplicating identical Reverse elements.
>>>
>>> 1. If you want to have all the Reverse elements in the source sorted as a
>>> single list, rather than a series of sorted lists, one for each Headword,
>>> then I think your problem is that you are doing your sort inside this
>>> for-each loop:
>>>      <xsl:for-each select="Words[Status!='Exclude']">
>>>
>>> So you need a template structure that goes directly from the
>>> whole-dictionary level right to the Reverse elements, rather than getting
>>> to
>>> them via the Words wrappers. Does that make sense? Maybe something like:
>>>
>>> <xsl:template match="Dictionary">
>>>   <xsl:for-each select="//Reverse">
>>>     <xsl:sort select="."/>
>>>     <p><b><xsl:value-of select="."/></b></p>
>>>     <xsl:value:of select="ancestor::Words/Headword"/>
>>>   </xsl:for-each>
>>> </xsl:template>
>>>
>>> PS: another way of sorting in xsl is with an attribute @order-by on the
>>> <for-each element. I don't know what the difference is between the
>>> methods,
>>> and it may be arcane.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. As for de-duplicating the Reverse elements: I don't think XSL is a
>>> particularly good tool for it; it's not a very good framework for
>>> comparing
>>> strings... and when you want to extract wordlists from data, you often
>>> get
>>> sets of things that are not identical character-by-character, but you
>>> would
>>> like to have treated as one.
>>>
>>> That said, it might work if you have a condition, simply asking at each
>>> Reverse element, "have I already displayed a Reverse element like this
>>> one?"
>>> And if not, then display it, but alongside display not just it's own
>>> Headword sibling, but the Headwords of each Reverse elements with that
>>> value.
>>>   Code could be something like this:
>>>
>>> <xsl:template match="Dictionary">
>>>   <xsl:for-each select="//Reverse">
>>>     <xsl:sort select="."/>
>>>     <!-- I'm not sure if you need this variable, but you might need it
>>> for
>>> the output bit below-->
>>>     <xsl:variable name="this_word" select="."/>
>>>     <xsl:choose>
>>>       <xsl:when test="$this_word =
>>> ancestor::Words/preceding-sibling::Words//Reverse">
>>>           <!-- no output - we've seen this Reverse before -->
>>>       </xsl:when>
>>>       <xsl:otherwise>
>>>          <!-- output the Reverse element -->
>>>          <p><b><xsl:value-of select="."/></b></p>
>>>          <!-- for each Words element that has this Reverse word in it,
>>> output the Headword -->
>>>          <xsl:for-each
>>> select="ancestor::Words/preceding-sibling::Words[descendent::Reverse =
>>> $this_word]
>>> or ancestor::Words/following-sibling::Words[descendent::Reverse =
>>> $this_word]">
>>>              <xsl:value:of select="Headword"/>
>>>          </xsl:for-each>
>>>       </xsl:otherwise>
>>>   </xsl:for-each>
>>> </xsl:template>
>>>
>>> I don't know if that will work, but it seems like it should.
>>>
>>> j
>>>
>>> On 28 February 2011 15:30, Aidan Wilson <a.wilson at pgrad.unimelb.edu.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>      Hi RNLDers (I still prefer "Ronaldos")
>>>
>>>      Does anyone have fairly good XSL skills and could guide me
>>>      through a particularly nasty dictionary formatting issue?
>>>
>>>      The problem is that I have a reverse word finder which is built
>>>      by extracting an element from each headword ('Reverse' which was
>>>      originally put in for exactly this purpose). Here's an example
>>>      of a word's XML (totally made up
>>>      example to demonstrate the point):
>>>
>>>      <Words>
>>>       <Headword>elevate</Headword>
>>>       <Category>verb</Category>
>>>       <Meanings>
>>>         <Definition>to raise, to lift</Definition>
>>>         <Reverse>raise</Reverse>
>>>         <Reverse>lift</Reverse>
>>>         <Examples>
>>>           <Example>You need to elevate your blood pressure</Example>
>>>           <Translation>You need to raise your blood
>>>      pressure</Translation>
>>>         </Examples>
>>>       </Meanings>
>>>      </Words>
>>>
>>>      The difficulty is that some words will have more than one
>>>      Reverse element (as above). At the moment I can either:
>>>      a) Extract only the first reverse element from each entry,
>>>      display it next to the headword, and all will be in alphabetical
>>>      order by the Reverse element, or
>>>      b) Extract all reverse elements from all headwords, and display
>>>      each one next to its headword, but they will be ordered *within
>>>      the set of reverse elements of that word.
>>>
>>>      What I mean by that, is that I can get it working so I can
>>>      produce:
>>>
>>>      Lift:
>>>       elevate
>>>
>>>      Raise:
>>>       elevate
>>>
>>>      But the Reverse elements from any other words will be sorted
>>>      amongst themselves, but independently of any other word. So what
>>>      I get in my English to Wagiman section is essentially ordered by
>>>      the Wagiman word, but each word's
>>>      English glosses sorted among themselves.
>>>
>>>      What I would like is to pair each reverse element with its
>>>      headword and then sort the whole list for the whole dictionary
>>>      at once.
>>>
>>>      Ideally, actually, I'd like to group together identical Reverse
>>>      elements so that I could have something like:
>>>
>>>      Lift:
>>>       boost
>>>       elevate
>>>       heighten
>>>       raise
>>>
>>>      Instead of listing them separately.
>>>
>>>      Here's the relevant section of my xsl stylesheet:
>>>
>>>      <xsl:for-each select="Words[Status!='Exclude']">
>>>             <xsl:sort select="Meanings/Reverse"/>
>>>             <xsl:for-each select="Meanings/Reverse">
>>>                     <p><strong><xsl:value-of
>>>      select="."/></strong><br/>
>>>                     <xsl:value-of select="../../Headword"/></p>
>>>             </xsl:for-each>
>>>      </xsl:for-each>
>>>
>>>      Hopefully this isn't an impossible task. And hopefully someone
>>>      knows more than my week's worth of xsl and can point me in the
>>>      right direction!
>>>
>>>      --
>>>      Aidan Wilson
>>>
>>>      PhD Candidate
>>>      Dept of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics
>>>      The University of Melbourne
>>>
>>>      +61428 458 969
>>>      a.wilson at pgrad.unimelb.edu.au
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/resource-network-linguistic-diversity/attachments/20110301/e8b9984c/attachment.htm>