[RNLD] H6 summary
Mark W. Post
markwpost at gmail.com
Mon Aug 8 03:44:06 UTC 2016
Dear Listmembers,
Thanks to everyone who responded to my Zoom H6 query, both on-list and
off. To summarize:
1) Battery life for the H6 seems longer than for the H4n, not shorter.
2) The H4n is no longer being made as such, although it is still
available through some channels and the H4nSP seems basically identical.
3) The H5 gets good reports, and may be just as good as the H6 for most
applications.
4) Some people prefer the H2n for its relative unobtrusiveness, although
other people point out the advantages of the H4nSP/H5/H6's XLR ins.
5) Opinions vary on the swappable mic heads - people who can afford and
use external mics are understandably negative about them, but people who
can't or prefer not to use external mics seem to like them a lot - which
makes sense. But clearly, it seems as though having them is better than
not having them - nobody said that their quality is so bad that they
shouldn't be used at all.
6) Very few langdoc people seem to use all the XLR ins of the H6, but
nobody complained about their existence either, and very few people
considered the H6 to be too bulky, heavy or more battery-hungry due to
its additional features.
In sum, the H6 seems like a good tool for people looking for a good
all-round audio recorder, although the H5 seems about as good and costs
a little bit less. People on an even tighter budget or with other
concerns might go for the H2n or an early-model H4n, but people using
external mics shouldn't use the H2 as their primary machine, and people
using the H4n should be aware of the potentially inferior H4n software,
battery life and handling noise.
Thanks again
Mark
More information about the Resource-network-linguistic-diversity
mailing list