Ablaut (RE: Obviative/Proximate and the Omaha verb system)
Wablenica
mosind at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 31 03:45:39 UTC 2001
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-siouan at lists.colorado.edu
> [mailto:owner-siouan at lists.colorado.edu]On Behalf Of Koontz John E
> Most Siouan languages behave as if in the ablauting set e ~ a the e were
> basic. Dakotan, does not, in two ways. One is that there are also some e
> ~ aN stems, like yatkaN 'to drink' (cf. OP dhattaN). The other is that a-
> and aN-final variants seem to be preferred as citation forms.
--Talking about citation forms, I'm inclined to think that at least two of
the native speaker use -e form as a basic one - Violet Catches and Albert
WhiteHat in their language books.
> It's sort of challenge to Dakotanists - one they haven't really taken up -
> or to comparative Siouanists in general - likewise - to explain how
> Dakotan came to be so different. Why does aN alternate with e? Why are
> the a-vowel grade the citation forms?
--Besides other reasons, -a form is a "default" form when any of the 25 000
words that do not trigger ablaut is following an -A/-AN verb. Among any
class of words - enclitics, determiners, postpositions - there are both
triggers and non-triggers of ablaut.
>
> The iN allomorph of A and AN in Dakotan doesn't occur in all the dialects,
> but it is found in Teton with the future =ktA. Nothing exactly like it is
> found elsewhere in Siouan.
=ktA triggers -a > -iN ablaut in Assiniboine too, at least in some
subdialects (Shaw, 1980)
Besides, -iN ablaut occurs in Lakota before:
conjunctions na, nahaN, naiNsh;
familiar imperative yetxo' (m.s.) (not everywhere?);
polite imperative ye (all sexes) (interchangeably with -i : o'makiyi ye!
help me! - o'kiyA, to help)
Connie miye yelo.
More information about the Siouan
mailing list