Indian perfume set.

[Rory M Larson]

>> I think Bob has answered my question.  So
>> pre-verbal u- in IO is in fact the same locative
>> prefix as MVS o- and OP u- ?

> Yes.  The initial *o- > u in IOM is/was originally
> a strictly phonological change.

I should add that this fact makes it quite possible
that the IOM /pyubraN/ - OP /nubdhaN/ set is indeed
from proto-MVS as John originally suggested, rather
than a later garbled loan from IO to OP as I
hypothesized yesterday.

Rory