major bookstore chain--uggh!

Wed Feb 16 02:04:56 UTC 2000

I think  the "oxymoron" may have been the Latin root of "dictionary" in
"dico/dicere/dixi/dictum - speak" with "sign" ?? :-). If so, its no more
oxymoronish (pardon me!) than "sign phonetics" which seems to have become
standard and accepted. Not much point in looking for logic in these things!!

Des

Adam Schembri wrote:

> I'm not sure why you think the term "sign dictionary" is an oxymoron since a
> dictionary may simply be an alphabetically ordered reference book (i.e., the
> Dictionary of Biography). Perhaps you mean that they really should be listed
> as ASL-English dictionaries, or something of this nature.
>
> Some have argued that the term "dictionary" ought not be applied to sign
> language reference books, and that a distinction can be made between books
> such as the BSL/English dictionary edited by Brien (which list signs
> according to handshapes, and gives English equivalents for BSL signs and
> then also provides definitions in English of these equivalents) or the
> Auslan dictionary by Johnston (which list signs according to handshapes and
> attempts to define signs in English and provide, where possible, English
> equivalents) and other books (such as Sternberg or Costello's reference
> books for ASL) as glossaries. I have some sympathy with this view.
>
> What I don't understand is some people's insistence that ASL books ought to
> be in the "foreign language" section of bookstores. Given that ASL evolved
> entirely in the USA, and may actually result from a mixture of LSF and
> Martha's Vineyard Sign Language (an older sign language that had been used
> in the USA for several generations), it seems to me that ASL is only
> slightly more "foreign" in North America than English!
>
> Adam Schembri
>
> >From: "Karlin, Ben" <MFKARLB at MAIL.DMH.STATE.MO.US>
> >Reply-To: "For the discussion of linguistics and signed languages."
> >      <SLLING-L at ADMIN.HUMBERC.ON.CA>
> >To: SLLING-L at ADMIN.HUMBERC.ON.CA
> >Subject: Re: major bookstore chain--uggh!
> >Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:46:00 -0600
> >
> >I suspect that the practice comes from the history of "Sign Language
> >Dictionaries" being a principal source of sign instruction. (Isn't a "Sign
> >Dictionary" an oxymoron?  Think about it.)
> >
> >A related question that comes to mind, haven't most of these books actually
> >been glossaries or lexicons?  Is my understanding of these terms wrong?
> >
> >Ben Karlin, St Louis MO
> >  ----------
> > > From: Petra Eccarius
> > > To: SLLING-L at ADMIN.HUMBERC.ON.CA
> > > Subject: Re: major bookstore chain--uggh!
> > > Date: Tuesday, 15 February, 2000 10:28AM
> > >
> > > The Barnes and Noble in Lafayette, Indiana (the closest
> > > for Purdue University students) also puts their Sign
> > > Language dictionaries, etc. in the reference section.
> > > It struck me as odd as I know I _have_ seen them in the
> > > foreign language section of other stores...
> > >
> > > ....petra
> > >  --
> > > Petra Eccarius
> > > Graduate Student in Linguistics
> > > Purdue University-West Laffayette
> > > eccarius at purdue.edu
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Linda Lee Lonning wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello everyone--
> > > >
> > > > An aside on how we see signed languages treated in
> > > terms of their
> > > > recognition in their placement in libraries and even
> > > in bookstores.  (I
> > > > read the ISO one initial email realllly quickly so
> > > excuse me if I'm not
> > > > capturing the essence of what ISO is exactly used
> > > for.)
> > > >
> > > > It has always rubbed me the wrong way as I peruse my
> > > area bookstores here
> > > > in Milwaukee (I'm talking specifically about our
> > > Barnes and Noble chain
> > > > here) to see ASL  **NOT** in the section for foreign
> > > languages (in the
> > > > case of ASL, and many other languages being present,
> > > please excuse the
> > > > reference to "foreign" in this case...but you see my
> > > point)...but they
> > > > place them in the *reference section (with the
> > > dictionaries, after all,
> > > > you can "learn" sign language by just memorizing a
> > > bunch of pictures,
> > > > right??  Uhhh!  ...OR I also see sign language books
> > > placed by the
> > > > enlarged-print books!  (After all, that's what sign
> > > language is, right?
> > > > An auxillary "device" or mechanism for communication,
> > > right??
> > > > Double-uhhh!!)
> > > >
> > > > I've asked personel at each book store what their
> > > rationale is for the
> > > > placement of sign language books where they are and
> > > explained that it
> > > > would more fairly placed at least with the "foreign"
> > > languages.  I've
> > > > submitted a feedback card to their regional or
> > > corporate office (where
> > > > ever that one was supposed to go)...NO response at
> > > all.  I was told I
> > > > should write something like their regional
> > > headquarters, etc.  Wow.  How
> > > > customer-friendly (?!)  BUT I'm told, the placement
> > > of media for Barnes
> > > > and Noble is decided higher up.
> > > >
> > > > I encourage folks to stop in their local
> > > bookstores/chains and check-out
> > > > where sign language/Deaf culture books are placed as
> > > well.  Let me know
> > > > what you find-- ;) .
> > > >
> > > > Linda L. Lonning, BS, CI & CT
> > > > University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee--Part-time Staff
> > > Interpreter
> > > > Community-based Interpreter with 3 Area Agencies
> > >
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

--
Professor Des Power, Director
Centre for Deafness Studies and Research, and
Language Australia, Centre for Deafness and Communication  Studies
Faculty of Education
Griffith University, QLD 4111
Australia

Tel:  (617) 3875 5654
Fax:  (617) 3875 5924
URL: http://www.edn.gu.edu.au/general/cdsr/home.htm