critiques of speech as nonphysical

[Karen Emmorey]

The treatment of speech as gesture is most prominent in the theory of
articulatory phonology.  You should look for papers by Louis
Goldstein, Cathy Browman, Carol Fowler, and their colleagues.  Here
are a couple of older references:

Browman. C.P., & Goldstein, L. (1991).  Gestural structures:
Distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change.  In
I.G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds).  Modularity and the motor
theory of speech perception.  pp. 313-338, Hilldale, NJ:  LEA.

Browman, C.P. & Goldstein, L. (1992).  Articulatory phonology:  an
overview.  Phonetica, 49, 155-180.

Karen Emmorey


>Hi folks:
>I'm not a sign language scholar, so please bear with this naive
>request. I'd appreciate it if someone could send me the bib. info.
>for what is considered the most prominent exposition and critique of
>the notion that speech is somehow "nonphysical." This would include
>any work that more specifically argues that speech is another form
>of gesture. At present, the following is the only article I've been
>able to come up with by googling the net, and I have no idea what
>it's status is in the eyes of those in the know:
>Löfqvist, A. (1990). Speech as audible gestures. In W. J. Hardcastle
>& A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modelling. Kluwer
>Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 289-322.
>Thanks for any help with this.
>Sincerely,
>Christian Nelson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/slling-l/attachments/20040315/8eb90a5f/attachment.htm>