FW: Re: nondominant handshapes

[Nassira Nicola]

>From Sarah Hafer at UNM.  :c)


>From: charityh at comcast.net
>To: maeveenroute at hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: nondominant handshapes
>Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:10:24 +0000
>
>Hey there,
>
>I still have a problem with getting my e-mails through to SL-Ling listserv.
>I was wondering could you send my message off to the listserv for me? If
>yes, my message is below. Thank you and see you soon in Cambridge!! :)
>
>Sarah
>--------------------------
>From:  charityh at comcast.net  [ Save Address ]
>To:  "For the discussion of linguistics and signed languages."
><SLLING-L at ADMIN.HUMBERC.ON.CA>
>Subject:  Re: nondominant handshapes
>Date:  Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:54:27 +0000
>
>
> > What would a native, non-initialized signed version of "email" look
>like?
>
>I, for one as a native signer, along with a mass number of native ASL
>signers
>especially in California and the East, use /FIST_hand down/ for the
>non-dominant hand and /SIDE FIST_on back hand of non-dominant hand + ONE/
>for the dominant hand. This sign is used only for the verb tense of
>'e-mail'.
>For noun, we fingerspell!! This is much more appreciated.
>
>Sarah Hafer
>
>
>
>--
>"It takes a complex mind to
>create a simple mind."

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous !
http://search.msn.fr/worldwide.asp