corr. 1

[Valerie Sutton]

SignWriting List
February 21, 2003

Dear Stefan, Tini and everyone -

-----------------

On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 04:03 PM, Tini Pel wrote:
> Thank you Stefan.
> Yes I agree with you about   C.   Much simpler.

-----------------

Yes, I agree with you too, Stefan! C and D are both fine, depending on 
whether you rub or brush. But one contact symbol is enough for proper 
reading. Actually I am glad to hear the two of you say this because we 
do need to make a decision. Why? Because signs that are written with 
two contact symbols have a different SignSpelling than signs that have 
one contact symbol, and it changes how the signs are sorted in 
dictionaries. That is why I love SignBank, because it will force us to 
look at standardizations for spelling...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 919 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20030221/dc3d7779/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: forgiveness.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 11992 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20030221/dc3d7779/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20030221/dc3d7779/attachment-0001.bin>