report form the Lisbon workshop

[Sandy Fleming]

> Antonio Carlos da Rocha Costa wrote:

>     Also, it is important to understand that SignWriting and HamNoSys are
> not alternatives for the same purpose. They are complementary, useful for
> different purposes, and to get a clear picture of such complementarity is
> also important, for the best profit of the development of sign language
> processing systems.

This is interesting. I thought they wre just two different writing systems
for sign languages?

What is the difference?

Sandy Fleming