[sw-l] ASL SIGN: image

Sun Nov 14 01:59:21 UTC 2004


You are right. 3 is also a way to sign it. The only difference from
image_2 and image_3 is style. I have seen both, but I would have to say
that I see image_2 more often than image_3. It might just be a matter of
region. Just my two cents on it. :-)


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
[mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] On Behalf Of Tini Pel
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:03 AM
To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
Subject: Re: [sw-l] ASL SIGN: image

Hello Valerie,
I understand # 3 the best.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Valerie Sutton" <sutton at signwriting.org>
To: <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
Cc: "Mikula Paul" <paulmikula at JUNO.COM>
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [sw-l] ASL SIGN: image

> SignWriting List
> November 13, 2004
> Which versions of the ASL sign for IMAGE look good to you all? See
> attached...


More information about the Sw-l mailing list