[sw-l] ASL SIGN: image

[Stuart Thiessen]

I would agree that I see 2 more than 3.

Stuart

On Nov 13, 2004, at 19:59, Adam wrote:

> Tini,
>
> You are right. 3 is also a way to sign it. The only difference from
> image_2 and image_3 is style. I have seen both, but I would have to say
> that I see image_2 more often than image_3. It might just be a matter
> of
> region. Just my two cents on it. :-)
>
> Adam
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> [mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] On Behalf Of Tini Pel
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:03 AM
> To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] ASL SIGN: image
>
> Hello Valerie,
> I understand # 3 the best.
> Tini.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Valerie Sutton" <sutton at signwriting.org>
> To: <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
> Cc: "Mikula Paul" <paulmikula at JUNO.COM>
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 1:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] ASL SIGN: image
>
>
>> SignWriting List
>> November 13, 2004
>>
>> Which versions of the ASL sign for IMAGE look good to you all? See
>> attached...
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> ----
> ----
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>