[sw-l] Sign Puddle editors and SignMaker loading

[Ingvild Roald]

Great,

then I will soon be asking for editor's rights for the Norwegian SignPudle,

and know that eventually the signs put there can go into the SignBank with
definitions etc.

Thanks.

Ingvild

sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu writes:
>Ingvild,
>
>Yes, it will be possible to load signs from Sign Puddle into SignBank.
>
>Not sure when, but it will happen.
>
>-Stephen
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>[mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu]On Behalf Of Ingvild Roald
>Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:47 AM
>To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>Subject: Re: [sw-l] Sign Puddle editors and SignMaker loading
>
>
>Sorry for my last question - had not read thorughly. What I meant to ask,
>is
>wether there is a possibility to load from SignMaker/ SignPudle into
>SignBank.
>
>Anyway, the work that is being done is great.
>
>Ingvild
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Valerie Sutton" <sutton at signwriting.org>
>>Reply-To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>>To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>>Subject: Re: [sw-l] Sign Puddle editors and SignMaker loading
>>Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 08:17:54 -0700
>>
>>SignWriting List
>>October 3, 2004
>>
>>Dear SignWriting List Members!
>>Stephen Slevinski's additions to the SignMaker and SignPuddle
>dictionaries
>>are just amazing! Thank you...
>>
>>We are working the details out behind the scenes, but soon those who have
>>already been working on the dictionaries will be given a Dictionary
>Editor
>>User Name, and Password. You will then be able to change signs, delete
>them
>>etc...This is a great way to keep the dictionary under the hands of a few
>>editors, so that changes are only made in a consistent fashion. Some
>>dictionaries will have a team of editors...
>>
>>What I like most, is the new feature to be able to load or re-paste a
>sign
>>that has already been created in SignMaker. Then you can make small
>changes
>>to that sign, and then add that different sign to the dictionary - this
>is
>>sorely needed and will make our editing experience a pleasure!
>>
>>Have a wonderful Sunday everyone!
>>
>>Val ;-)
>>
>>-------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Oct 2, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Stephen Slevinski wrote:
>>
>>>Hi List,
>>>
>>>I've made a few changes to Sign Puddle.  This isn't everything that I
>>>initially wanted, but it is needed.
>>>
>>>SignMaker Loading...
>>>It is possible to load signs into SignMaker.  You will notice a new icon
>>>on
>>>the left side menu, "Upload".  Previously, this icon allowed a user to
>>>load
>>>an image into the dictionary.  It now allows a user to load a sign into
>>>SignMaker.
>>>
>>>To use this screen, enter search criteria and press Search.  When the
>>>results are displayed, you can press the Load button next to a sign to
>>>have
>>>the sign loaded into SignMaker.
>>>
>>>However, not all signs will have a Load button.  Only signs that were
>>>created with the improved SignMaker (Javascript) can be loaded.
>>>
>>>Sign Puddle editors...
>>>On the same Upload screen, if you scroll all the way down the screen
>below
>>>the flags, you will find a form for a user and a password.  Once you
>enter
>>>a
>>>valid username and password, 2 additional buttons will display on this
>>>screen for each sign: rename and delete.  These are the editor functions
>>>available.
>>>
>>>If you would like to be an editor for any Sign Puddle dictionary, please
>>>send me an email at slevin at oculog.net.
>>>
>>>I still do not know who should be an editor, or how many editors a
>>>dictionary should have, or who should decide.  Any ideas would be
>welcome.
>>>
>>>-Stephen
>>>---
>>>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>>>Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/22/2004
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>