kind of a symposium report by Lucy
Valerie Sutton
sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG
Thu Aug 11 15:42:43 UTC 2005
SignWriting List
August 11, 2005
THANK YOU, Lucyna, for your report. Great to see a report about the
Symposium....I hope others will write one too....Val ;-)
-----------------------------
On Aug 11, 2005, at 7:58 AM, Lucyna Dlugolecka wrote:
> Hello List!
> Nobody have written a report on the symposium in Brussels yet, so,
> I, encouraged by Valerie and Stefan, have written some remarks.
> They look like complaints but they are no complaints, just remarks
> by a person who didn't really realize what was going on. Hopefully
> they will be helpful for future reference
>
> Well, before the symposium we were told via e-mail that there would
> be two workshops groups at the symposium, the spelling one held by
> Stefan and Sara, and the computer workshops held by Lars and
> Daniel. Well, I wanted to participate in all the workshops in order
> to write an article for Swiat Ciszy afterwards. But Kathleen
> informed me it wouldn’t be possible as the spelling and the
> computer workshops would take place simultaneously, so I wrote to
> Kathleen I would be sitting on spelling the first day and on
> computers the second day.
> But on place I saw a list at the white board with my name put under
> the spelling workshop for both the first and second days. I told
> Kathleen there was a mistake and she said I should correct it, so I
> transferred my name to the computer workshop that was to be held
> the second day.
> Well, the first day I was sitting for the spelling lesson held by
> Stefan and Sara. I could follow Stefan very well but what he was
> teaching I and most of other participants were familiar with.
> Stefan was teaching so as if we were kids. It was valuable in a way
> as we could see how children are taught but for on the other hand
> it was boring to us. A film showing the teaching of SW to young
> pupils would be as valuable too but we (at least I) wanted to
> discuss some deeper issues.
> Well, the same day there was also a computer workshop by Lars and I
> went to it as I just wanted to see what would happen there and so
> on and I hoped to learn something too as some time before I had
> downloaded Lars’ program but it did not work on my computer. But it
> was so that Lars was speaking English, and one of the ISL
> interpreters was interpreting Lars but I could not follow him as
> both the interpreters spoke (signed) a language quite foreign to
> me. Daniel was sitting there by me and I asked him to do something
> with Python so that it could work but he failed.
> (at last Lars helped me during a break - thank you, Lars!)
> The next day there was new grouping but I had only a faint idea of
> it and in order to make sure of the groups (as far as I could
> understand, there were 3 groups then) I asked Stefan, using some
> signs and English words, if he was going the teach the basics
> again. He agreed so I followed another group as I didn’t want to
> exercise the basics in the childish way again…
> I know very well I was not prepared very well for the meeting but
> the fact was also that I did not know how I should be prepared as
> it was the first international SL users meeting in my life…
> After all, I hoped for some more written English information as
> written English is the easiest way to communicate with foreigners.
> Those who could not understand the International Sign, could hear
> and understand spoken English and I could not understand either
> this or that. I felt adrift… (Val told me she was expected to
> prepare more materials in SW but do not forget: in order to read in
> ASL you must know ASL!)
> I think, if I participated in the Maastricht congress, I would have
> some time to learn the International Sign as I did in Brussels but
> the symposium lasted only 2 days, too few to learn much although
> the third day, after the symposium, it was much easier to me to
> communicate with Daniel, Ingvild and Ulrike at the hotel and in the
> city of Brussels (I met Daniel in the city on Saturday). But
> communicating in person is not the same yet as “listening” to a
> speech...
> Stefan, you were confused because I did not ask for more when you
> saw my signs written incorrect. Well, it was during the break and I
> did not want to take your time, I know we all were tired, more or
> less. Most of you came from Maastricht, some (including me) did not
> sleep very well at that hotel in Groot Bijgaarden and some few
> (especially me) came from afar, by air and I did not felt very well
> after the flight, especially after the flight from Brussels to
> Warsaw, unfortunately.
> And now I have a problem.
> I have promised my boss to write an article about the symposium for
> the Swiat Ciszy magazine. In order to do it I need your help (or
> does anyone want to be a co-author of it?)
> 1. What is the exact number of participants and what countries did
> they
> represent? (I've got a list but it's incomplete or out of date,
> perhaps).
> 2. What about the European SignWriter Organisation? Has it been
> already
> established? Was it a SW or ESWO symposium at all?
> 3. When and where will be the next SW/WSWO symposium?
> 4. What were the main issues raised by the participants?
> I would be grateful if you answered these questions in brief. I may
> have some more questions later.
> Lucy
>
>
>
> GG 3618151 SMS +48505273292 MSN deafie at gmx.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20050811/0fc3e5c0/attachment.htm>
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list