AW: [sw-l] Confused about Confused

Stefan Wöhrmann stefanwoehrmann at GEBAERDENSCHRIFT.DE
Fri May 27 20:28:56 UTC 2005


Hi Valerie, Charles and everybody - 


Yes Charles - I agree - same with me - I had to think about the second
spelling - well it is written correct - no question about that -- 

though it is not just a different perspective but a different orientation of
the hands as well (fingers forward) 

In these cases I love to just play around and experiment with different
versions of spellings - 

so in order to offer more confusion (smile) I attach another gif with 
several options - 

Stefan ;-) 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
[mailto:owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu] Im Auftrag von Charles Butler
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Mai 2005 05:47
An: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
Betreff: Re: [sw-l] Confused about Confused

I can read first Confused.  The second Confused
(though the same handshapes from a different
perspective, don't match the motion instinctively for
me.

charles butler

--- Valerie Sutton <sutton at signwriting.org> wrote:
> SignWriting List
> May 26, 2005
> 
> I have now fixed SignPuddle...what do you think of
> these two  
> SignSpellings for CONFUSED in ASL?:
> 
> o?<
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: confused.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2398 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20050527/9c163e6d/attachment.gif>


More information about the Sw-l mailing list