[sw-l] POLAND ...symbol for opening eyes?

[Bill Reese]

Val,

It's not necessary for a new symbol Val.  The simplicity and unambiguity
of the current Eyes Open symbol makes them preferable.  I was curious
more about the history.  Did you start out with oval eyes?

Bill


Valerie Sutton wrote:

> SignWriting List
> May 5, 2005
>
> Bill Reese wrote:
>
>     This had me wondering why not an oval for a normally opened eye.
>     I rewrote Lucinda's symbol with that idea.
>
>
> That would add another symbol to the IMWA, Bill...do you think it is
> really necessary? The first one in the attached diagram is really Eyes
> Open...the word Open is missing. Where would you put your oval eyes?...
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20050506/27af16a3/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 3210 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20050506/27af16a3/attachment.png>