There is a solution for the 10 handshape! ;-)

[Ingvild Roald]

I read Bill's figure as left hand already half shaded - right hand would be 
reversed in loop. (This symbol is just for the half-shaded variations 
anyway)

Ingvild





>From: "Stuart Thiessen" <sw at PASSITONSERVICES.ORG>
>Reply-To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>Subject: Re: [sw-l] There is a solution for the 10 handshape! ;-)
>Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:21:54 -0500
>
>Bill,
>
>I like that. I'll have to practice it.  The shading could come after that 
>has been set up.  Do you have a similar handwriting strategy for the 
>handshapes that correspond with the ASL "B" and "E"? I'd be interested to 
>see what you have been doing on that.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Stuart
>
>On Sep 26, 2005, at 21:40, Bill Reese wrote:
>
>>Val,
>>  I seem to remember someone awhile back saying that handwriting that kind 
>>of circle was a bit difficult, as it tended to get lost in the symbol.
>>  I've come up with a plausible adaptation rather quickly, though , so I 
>>believe that circle could be very amenable to progressive change.
>>
>><unknown.png>
>>
>>  Bill
>>
>>
>>  Valerie Sutton wrote:
>>>SignWriting List
>>>  September 25, 2005
>>>
>>>  Charles Butler wrote:
>>>>Yes!!! very clear.
>>>
>>>  Tini Pel wrote:
>>>>I like that, Valerie,
>>>>  Tini.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Hello Everyone!
>>>  Ha! I didn't expect such rapid approval ;-)
>>>
>>>  Here is an interesting summary of this specific symbol...Looking at  
>>>these three choices, which do you like better? We could include all  
>>>three variations in the IMWA if we feel we have to...Right now I am  
>>>curious what List members think at first glance...What seems easiest  to 
>>>read? Val ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  <unknown.gif>
>>>
>>>
>><Tenhand.png><mime-attachment>