Symbol consistancy?

Adam Frost adam at FROSTVILLAGE.COM
Wed Aug 23 04:41:11 UTC 2006

I think I was a little vague with words because I am talking about the next
level of order. Since I am now at a desktop computer, I can sceen copy what
I meant.

This screen shot from SignText first shows the set of symbols that I was
refering to, and the second is the base symbol that I was compareing. Notice
that the third and sixth columns are ordered differently.


On 8/22/06, Valerie Sutton <signwriting at> wrote:
> SignWriting List
> August 22, 2006
> Adam Frost wrote:
> > I was doing some symbol work (for my website) and I noticed that
> > some symbols aren't ordered consistantly. The one that I caught was
> > 01-01-003-01-03 compared to 01-01-001-01-03. I went to SignText and
> > it looks as if 01-01-004, 01-01-005, and 01-01-006 have the same
> > difference. Is this supposed to be different?
> Hello Adam!
> Thanks for this message. Attached is a screen capture of the symbols
> you mention and they correct and consistent. Is it possible that your
> browser's cache is overloaded and needs to be cleared? yesterday I
> received a phone call from someone who said that the symbols looked
> weird in Firefox and when she cleared the cache and cleared the
> history in Firefox, presto, everything looked good again! So to test
> this, try accessing the same symbols in another browser to see if
> they look the same in the other browser...
> Looking at the attached diagram, each index-finger handshape has a
> different shape for the base of the for D hand,
> open-C, oval, angle and so forth, make the handshapes different from
> each other...
> Does this help?  Val ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Doc1.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 159232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the Sw-l mailing list