SignWriting Terminology
Valerie Sutton
sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG
Tue Mar 21 21:41:44 UTC 2006
SignWriting List
March 21, 2006
Steve Slevinski wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by equating the Roman alphabet to SignWriting.
> The Roman alphabet is a sequence of ordered symbols. SignWriting
> is a system for writing signed languages. I think the Roman
> alphabet is similar to the IMWA. And I think that SignWriting is
> similar to what is taught in English class.
>
> Cherie Wren wrote:
> I understand what Val means. The Roman alphabet is a system of
> symbols that can write several different languages. Not all of
> them, but a good number of them. SignWriting is a system of
> symbols that writes signed languages. The IMWA is a bigger thing
> that writes more than just signed languages, it writes any and all
> movement. Just like the international phonetic alphabet can write
> sounds, not just those in the certain subset of languages written
> using the Roman alphabet.
That is correct, Cherie! Perfect! That is what I am trying to say!
SignWriting is an alphabet that can be used to write a series of
languages, signed languages.
The Roman Alphabet is NOT the Internationl Phonetic Alphabet,
Steve...The IPA was developed because the Roman Alphabet did not have
enough symbols in it to write every detail of speech...so the Roman
Alphabet and the IPA are both for speech...the Roman Alphabet is for
daily use, and the IPA is more for research use...
SignWriting is for daily use, and the IMWA is more for research use...
But you have blessed us by giving us the IMWA when we create signs,
and in that sense, you have helped us greatly, because right now, we
cannot know all the symbols needed to write one specific Sign
Language, so for the moment, choosing symbols from the IMWA is
great...but later, with your Symbol-Frequency searching method, you
are helping us pin down the specific SignWriting alphabets for each
Sign Language...in time we will not need the IMWA but will have a
finite set of symbols that are specific for each Sign Language...that
finite set of symbols is SignWriting for everyday use...that is what
the Roman Alphabet is...it is a finite set of symbols specified for
each spoken language...
The Roman Alphabet is NOT alphabetical order, although it uses
alphabetical order...
The Roman Alphabet are the symbols themselves and how they
look...like N, and M are both from the Roman Alphabet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20060321/3ba76191/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Terminology2.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 7826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20060321/3ba76191/attachment.gif>
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list