SignPuddle Online Directory Page

[CWren at DOE.K12.GA.US]

I agree, I like 'ARTICLES' much better than the initialized encyclopedia 
sign.

---------------------------------
Cherie Wren
GSD Staff Interpreter
232 Perry Farm Rd
Cave Spring, GA 30124
706-777-2328
706-766-0766 Cell

This message and any included attachments are from the Georgia School for 
the Deaf and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information 
contained herein may include privileged or otherwise confidential 
information. If you have received this message in error, please contact 
the sender immediately, and delete it from your system.



"Stuart Thiessen" <sw at passitonservices.org> 
Sent by: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
04/26/2007 01:26 PM
Please respond to
sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu


To
sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
cc

Subject
Re: [sw-l] SignPuddle Online Directory Page






I think the signs are ok. I am not excited about the initialized sign 
for encyclopedia, but it is the current sign in use. I haven't seen a 
different sign yet. If I do, I will write it and send it to you. :) 
One possible alternative that just occurred to me is to use this:   which 
is the sign for articles since an encyclopedia is really a 
book of articles about different topics.

Thanks,

Stuart

On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:52, Valerie Sutton wrote:

> SignWriting List
> April 26, 2007
>
> Hello Stuart and Everyone!
> Next message we can start discussing repeated movements...(later 
> today)...the message will be called Repeated Movements...good topic!
>
> But right now I need your help with the directory (see attached)...
>
> I need to ask all ASL signers...Are these icons for the ASL 
> directory ok with you? I looked up the sign for Encyclopedia in an 
> ASL dictionary, and found it to be an initialized sign...like 
> dictionary is...but with an E hand....is that ok?
>
> And for the sign for Literature, I just wrote Reading-Down-In- 
> Columns...is that ok?
>
> If not, I can change the icons to fit better with ASL users...
>
> These icons are so small, we just want to get a quick glance to 
> know what it is, and it doesn't have to be a full sign if the Deaf 
> user will recognize the link quickly...
>
> We could use the sign for Book, for literature, if you feel that is 
> better... Val ;-)
>
>
> <Picture 1.png>
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070426/8e86c5b2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pastedGraphic.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 5178 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070426/8e86c5b2/attachment.tiff>