Deaf Residential Schools in the US...
K.J. Boal
kjoanne403 at HOTMAIL.COM
Thu Jan 18 04:57:56 UTC 2007
Actually, I'm hoping to do a Ph.D. research project in the near future on
exactly that, Cherie! But it will be a while before any results are in . .
. if the project even gets off the ground . . . I'm hoping to get started on
the program either this year or next but I don't know when or where I'll be
doing it . . . I'll keep you posted on my progress!
KJ
>From: "Cherie Wren" <cwterp at YAHOO.COM>
>Reply-To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>Subject: Re: [sw-l] Deaf Residential Schools in the US...
>Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:47:47 -0800 (PST)
>
>But in order to get the schools to accept SW, you have to hit them on what
>THEY think is important: and that is English. Period. End of story. so
>although SW will have benefits far beyond its limited use in promoting
>English literacy, that HAS to be the sell point. Because that is all Deaf
>education is about right now. English Literacy. Oh, those other things
>get done, but English Literacy is THE goal of Deaf education in the United
>States, sad to say. And although there is no proof, there is research that
>supports it. Read Cummins on bilingual education. He proposes a theory
>that In bilingual education (he is talking about Spanish/English) there are
>two ways to get to English Literacy for Spanish speaking students. One is
>via spoken English, the other is via Written Spanish. Apply that to Deaf
>kids. Teh 'via spoken English ' route is not applicable. So the route to
>English Literacy will only come via written ASL. There is also research
>that proves that ASL
> proficiency (Not only in Deaf of Deaf, but in Deaf of hearing with
>strong ASL skills)has a very high correlation with English Literacy. That
>is to say, if the kid has a strong first language, he will be able to get
>the second language easier. So SW wins again, because while you teach
>written signing, you can teach ASL at the same time. Here at GSD, we hope
>to get some of that proof that everyone wants to see... but you can't get
>proof till someone does the research , and you can't do the research till
>you have proof, at least in our case...
>
>cherie
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: "James Shepard-Kegl, Esq." <kegl at MAINE.RR.COM>
>To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 5:50:14 PM
>Subject: Re: [sw-l] Deaf Residential Schools in the US...
>
>Re: [sw-l] Deaf Residential Schools in the US...
>
>
>
>I respectfully submit that when you propose SW as a bridge to English
>literacy in the school system, you are missing the point.
>
>
>
>SW is a valuable tool for giving a Deaf signer metalinguistic skills in his
>or her native language (i.e., understanding labels like nouns, verbs,
>classifiers, role shifting, shared references, and so forth.) Having
>metalinguistic skills in your own language is critical to learning the
>grammar and syntax of a foreign (that is, non-native) language.
>
>
>
>But, if you are expecting miracle English literacy achievement through SW,
>think again. SW helps, to be sure, and a greater proponent than I you will
>not find, but do not oversell the concept, as proof is scarce.
>
>
>
>Where SW is really, really beneficial is: MATH, SCIENCE, HISTORY.
>
>
>
>Math, to be of any real value in life, is all about applied math, which we
>learn through practicing those dreaded verbal problems. Use SW to teach
>them, so that the Deaf child knows what you are talking about. Otherwise,
>the math problem just becomes an English problem, and if you do not read
>English, you appear to be moronic. Try TWO PLUS TWO in Chinese and see how
>far you get.
>
>
>
>My daughter's teachers in Portland, Maine High School are encouraging her
>to answer her science tests in SW -- because the goal is achievement in the
>material taught in that particular class, not rote memorization of English
>without any real comprehension.
>
>
>
>-- James
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionid=b2456790-90e6-4d28-9219-5d7207d94d45&mkt=en-ca
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list