AW: [sw-l] Eye-Blinks

[Stuart Thiessen]

However, the more complicated it is to write frequently occurring 
items, the more frustrating it can become. Eyeblinks are a frequent 
part of SLs. However, the face is already a tight space even though it 
is one of the most complex part of SL. So the more simple we can keep 
it, the better. IMHO.

That is why I favor both methods: one is phonemic and the other is more 
phonetic.
On Jan 22, 2007, at 16:32, eric mead wrote:

> I support this idea (see below). The more symbols added, the less 
> likely any kind of standard is to evolve... which is useful for 
> developing a writing system meant to be widespread.
>
> -ERIC
>
>
>
>  
>> From:  "Ingvild Roald" <ingvild.roald at STATPED.NO>
>> Reply-To:  sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>> To:  sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>> Subject:  Re: AW: [sw-l] Eye-Blinks
>> Date:  Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:09:27 +0100
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >I thought we could do with just what we have?
>> >
>> >Namely, the face circle with eyes and the little v arrowhead beside 
>> the
>> >eye. This we get both blinking with one eye, and blinking with two.
>> >
>> >It would be understood that the eyes open again after a short while 
>> ...
>> >
>> >This would be easy to read and to write
>> >
>> >See attached
>> >
>> >Ingvild
>> >
>>
>> ><< blink-both-eyes.php.png >>
>>
>> ><< blink-right-eye.png >>
>>
>
> From photos to predictions, The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden 
> Globes