multiple faces, changing eye gaze

[Valerie Sutton]

On Jul 12, 2007, at 6:28 AM, CWren at doe.k12.ga.us wrote:
>  Here the Things run up to Me and Sally.  For both of these signs,  
> I only used one set of dots.  I know that is not technically right,  
> but it looked better to me, and since its between the movement  
> arrows, I thought it was readable.  What say you?  Also for the  
> second one, I don't have the hands technically right.  The left  
> hand is not mirrored correctly.  But when I did that it didn't look  
> right.  In the sign above I did mirror them, and am not completely  
> happy with how it looks, particularly for the X part...  The 1 part  
> looks okay.   I am letting the fact that this will be edited by  
> other people give me the freedom to experiment...  ::grin::


Yes...freedom to experiment is very important with such an unusual  
and rather mime-like document...and with many editors I am sure we  
can come to a good conclusion...so just keep writing and enjoy every  
minute...it is fun for us to read it too!

I have not had time to look at the video yet...I am getting there and  
will get back to you...other people's thoughts about this sign?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Unknown-1.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4085 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070712/c42b49bb/attachment.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------