multiple faces, changing eye gaze

[Valerie Sutton]

On Jul 12, 2007, at 6:28 AM, CWren at doe.k12.ga.us wrote:
> Here the Things run up to Me and Sally.  For both of these signs, I  
> only used one set of dots.  I know that is not technically right,  
> but it looked better to me, and since its between the movement  
> arrows, I thought it was readable.  What say you?  Also for the  
> second one, I don't have the hands technically right.  The left  
> hand is not mirrored correctly.  But when I did that it didn't look  
> right.  In the sign above I did mirror them, and am not completely  
> happy with how it looks, particularly for the X part...  The 1 part  
> looks okay.   I am letting the fact that this will be edited by  
> other people give me the freedom to experiment...  ::grin::


Cherie - are the captured photos from the video (see attached) the  
correct sign you are trying to write here? Hard sign! But very  
interesting ;-)

Before I try to focus on it, I want to be sure this is the correct  
sign on the video...that coordinates with the writing to the right in  
the attached...


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CatSign.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 24298 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070712/97f060f8/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------