question on a sign notation

[Charles Butler]

I'd like to see the video, but I do not seem to be able to open it to compare the writing.  Can you send me another link privately.

chazzer3332000 at yahoo.com


"K.J. Boal" <kjoanne403 at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote: I agree with the first sign, I think it's well written.  The second sign 
looks like it should move up and out instead of down and out.  I like the 
third sign the way you've written it too... I would write both the start and 
end positions.  It was very easy to read.  I would only change the second 
sign.
KJ


>From: "Anne-Claude Prélaz Girod" 
>Reply-To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>To: "SW-List" 
>CC: "Anita Hirschi" ,        "Yves Bula" 
>
>Subject: [sw-l] question on a sign notation
>Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:48:47 +0200
>
>can any of you help me with the sign /CALVITIE/ (to be bold).... you  can 
>find the video on  http://www.pisourd.ch/index.php?theme=dicocomplet
>
>that's my trial....
>any suggestion about the movement of the first and second sign ??
>
>what about the third one.... should I write both starting and ending  
>position or is it not necessary ??
>
>thanks for your help
>
>Anny
>
>
>Anne-Claude Prélaz Girod
>ruelle des chambres chaudes 1
>1271 Givrins
>Tel ++41/22.362.52.37
>Fax ++41/22.362.52.66
>mail: acpg at vtxnet.ch
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get the Kung Fu Bunny Theme pack free! 
http://www.imagine-windowslive.com/Themes/Messenger/Reward/Default.aspx?Locale=en-CA#



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070508/724d5162/attachment.htm>