Old SignPuddle 1.0 Dictionaries...

[CWren at DOE.K12.GA.US]

I have used 1.0 as a resource.  I haven't entered any new words in there, 
but I have looked up things I wrote before.  I like to look at the 
variations in writing sometimes, to decide how I want to write what I am 
writing...  ::grin::  Lots of writes in that sentence! 

---------------------------------
Cherie Wren
GSD Staff Interpreter
232 Perry Farm Rd
Cave Spring, GA 30124
706-777-2328
706-766-0766 Cell

This message and any included attachments are from the Georgia School for 
the Deaf and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information 
contained herein may include privileged or otherwise confidential 
information. If you have received this message in error, please contact 
the sender immediately, and delete it from your system.



"Valerie Sutton" <signwriting at MAC.COM> 
Sent by: owner-sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
05/14/2007 01:59 PM
Please respond to
sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu


To
sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
cc

Subject
[sw-l] Old SignPuddle 1.0 Dictionaries...






SignWriting List
May 14, 2007

Hello Steve and Everyone!

Guess what? I was slow to change all the web pages for each country, 
to direct them to their new SignPuddle 1.5 dictionaries....plus some 
people still have old bookmarks for the old SignPuddle 1.0 
dictionaries...and plus some people may not feel the need to change 
to SignPuddle 1.5...

But the end result is that some of the old SignPuddle 1.0 
dictionaries are still being used, and they are growing larger, while 
the new ones with their transferred signs, are not growing in 
SignPuddle 1.5...

I wonder if we should change over officially to SignPuddle 1.5 now 
and no longer have 1.0 on the web?

I am not saying we have to do this...

It might be a very bad idea to do that too..

I am writing to ask you what your opinions are?

Do you think we should all jump to SignPuddle 1.5 now?

Or are some of you still using SignPuddle 1.0?

Should we leave both on the web forever, or what is your opinion?

Val ;-)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070514/5b5c40bb/attachment.htm>