spelling question
Valerie Sutton
signwriting at MAC.COM
Fri Jan 9 19:30:20 UTC 2009
SignWriting List
January 9, 2009
Hello Ingvild!
Thanks for this question. Great to hear from you again ;-)
The most accurate writing is the fourth one in your example below.
I found this writing in your Norwegian Dictionary in SignPuddle, and
it is the spelling that is the least complicated and will always be
read well by new readers:
Originally, as you know, SignWriting did not have dots for Squeeze
Finger Motion...we just wrote the positions with arrows between the
positions...so the above is an old writing, but an accurate one...
later, we developed the dots for multiple repeated squeezing of
fingers...using the dots for only one squeeze was rarely used in the
beginning, since that could be written with simple positions...
I will write a second email next, explaining what I would do if I want
to use a single Squeeze dot...
Val ;-)
-------------
On Jan 9, 2009, at 5:23 AM, iroald at hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
> How would you spell this number? As it should be easy to red ant to
> write, I thought no 1, but I know that by the rules it should be no
> 2 or no 3. No 4 is also correct, but for a number sign it seems too
> large to me ... I am not at all sure. The top three my even all be
> incorrect by the placing of the arrow. It is placed there for
> economy of space, but maybe this consideration is not valid ...
>
>
> Could you help me ouyt please? The number system comes with this
> form for 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90, as well as the first
> part of 21 - 29, 31 - 39, etc., which makes this decision important
>
>
> Thank you all,
>
>
> Ingvild
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090109/6ab2a5c1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 3.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10771 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090109/6ab2a5c1/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SignMail-1231507067-1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 550 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090109/6ab2a5c1/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________
SW-L SignWriting List
Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
More information about the Sw-l
mailing list