spelling repeated movement

[SignWriting]

SignWriting List
March 31, 2009

Thank you Charles and Bill!

This is fine. Personally I like writing the arrows in full, three  
times, but getting rid of the arrowheads on two of them is still clear  
I think...it all depends on how others read it. But I can read this  
with two of the arrowheads dropped...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: triplemotion.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090331/df53d0ed/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------



And thank you, Bill, for the suggestion of writing three smaller  
arrows...that is exactly what many people do and it actually became  
symbols in their own rights..small clustered arrows in groups mean  
multiple movements done quickly in the same direction...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 850 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090331/df53d0ed/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------



Val ;-)

-----------


On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Charles Butler wrote:

> I was thinking of the motion without the arrow to show a multiple  
> arc motion.  I remember the old "alternate motion" arc and wonder if  
> that might also be used here as a double single line to show  
> multiple arcs along the same line whatever the direction of movement.
>
> From: Bill Reese <wreese01 at tampabay.rr.com>
> To: SignWriting List <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:31:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [sw-l] spelling repeated movement
>
> I've been following along with this for awhile and was wondering the  
> same thing - about putting the arrow heads side-by-side, but then  
> realized it might be misinterpreted as a repeat movement that gets  
> lower as it's repeated.   The only other option I could think of was  
> if the movement arrows were smaller.  Three small movement arrows  
> together might be seen as less of an impact on the total sign.
>
> original arrows: 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: moz-screenshot-1.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4997 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090331/df53d0ed/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
>
>
> smaller arrows:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: moz-screenshot.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4729 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090331/df53d0ed/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
>
>
> Bill
>
>
> Charles Butler wrote:
>>
>> I immediately read it as extended little motions beyond the first  
>> curve.  I'd put the arrow heads side-by-side even without the lines.
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>> From: Stefan Wöhrmann <stefanwoehrmann at gebaerdenschrift.de>
>> To: SignWriting List <sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 4:23:13 AM
>> Subject: [sw-l] spelling repeated movement
>>
>> Hi Valerie, sw-list members -
>>
>> today I thought about a second way to indicate that the same  
>> movement is performed two or three times. Just adding another  
>> arrowhead should be enough – what do you think? Would you read both  
>> spellings as the same? Sometimes this option – if possible – would  
>> allow to write the sign not so complex.
>> water supply  (Wasserzulauf)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mime-attachment.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5204 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090331/df53d0ed/attachment.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------

>>
>>
>>
>> Same as: ???
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mime-attachment.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5481 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090331/df53d0ed/attachment-0001.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------

>>
>>
>>
>> Stefan ;-)
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> SW-L SignWriting List
>>
>> Post Message
>> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>>
>> List Archives and Help
>> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>>
>> Change Email Settings
>> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: triplemotion.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20090331/df53d0ed/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________
>
> SW-L SignWriting List
>
> Post Message
> SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>
> List Archives and Help
> http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/
>
> Change Email Settings
> http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l

-------------- next part --------------



____________________________________________

SW-L SignWriting List

Post Message
SW-L at majordomo.valenciacc.edu

List Archives and Help
http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/

Change Email Settings
http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l