Report on the Workshop at Gallaudet University
chazzer3332000 at YAHOO.COM
Tue May 24 20:45:40 UTC 2011
The work of Rachel Channon using not only SignWriting but her own Sign Type
system and a way to describe the features of HamnoSys into a massive corpus
program containing most of the world's sign language transcription systems would
At the last TISLR, SignWriting had the largest corpus represented, while
HamnoSys was a close second.
From: Adam Frost <icemandeaf at GMAIL.COM>
To: SW-L at LISTSERV.VALENCIACC.EDU
Sent: Tue, May 24, 2011 4:16:20 PM
Subject: Report on the Workshop at Gallaudet University
As several of you already know, I gave a presentation on SignWriting at a
workshop at Gallaudet this past weekend. The title of the workshop was "Building
sign language corpora in North America". A corpus is essentially a collection of
data, or in this case a collection of data on Sign Language in North America
that can be called upon for various researches in Sign Language Linguistics.
There were a good number of people from various parts of the world including
Spain, Germany, and Australia. There were about 50 people in attendance, most of
whom had some work in the field of linguistics.
The presentation that I presented was called "Sign Language Corpus with
SignWriting". I gave a short history on SignWriting and how it has been used in
various capacities in various countries writing the world's sign languages.
Because SignWriting is based on the features of Sign Languages, I explained how
it can be used to build a corpus so that features of Sign Languages can be
searched and not only limited to signs as a whole. I then gave an example with a
short part of the Cat in the Hat showing how this could be done with Handshapes,
Movements, etc. The reason this was possible was because of the work with UTF-8
code that is available with SignPuddle. This also makes it possible to work
seamlessly with a program that many linguists in the US already use, ELAN. The
only problem is that as of now they cannot see the actual symbols without some
sort of plug-in, but it is still very searchable regardless.
I then explained that there are some differences with daily writing versus
writing for analytical use. For example, there are symbols that can be used to
encode location that are not used in everyday writing because the relations of
the symbols imply the location. I also mentioned that there are times that
beginning or ending hands or even contact symbols are not written in everyday
writing because it is understood, but would most likely be necessary for
Some comments that I got from those in the audience were: Why SignWriting isn't
more widely used as a written form for ASL in the US, since it has been around
for over 30 years? It is obviously a very powerful tool. My response was that
written forms take many years, if not generations, before it is accepted. Take a
look at English, which had many illiterate users for many generations regardless
of it been written for so many generations. There was also another commenter who
felt that I was suggesting that SignWriting be the only thing used in a corpus.
My reply was quite the opposite. I explained that there might be some research
that will greatly benefit from the analytical power that SignWriting has to
offer while others might not gain anything from it. My suggestion was to have a
place within the corpus for SignWriting as a tool available for those who will
benefit from it.
Overall, it was a very good workshop and my presentation was received very well.
The people who put together the workshop have also created a blog for those who
want to know more about what happened. http://aslcorpus.blogspot.com/. For those
who would like to take a look at the Power Point that I used, I will send it to
the list in my next message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sw-l