AW: (Now yes, you have the video!) A ortografic correction on Facebook!

[Charles Butler]

Eu penseu que primeiro escrito e attentou escriver receptivo nao expressivo. O licao escrive expressivo e mao oscuro nao claro.
I think that the first writing is attempting to write a movement expressively and gets the facing wrong. This is a common mistake in writing from a teacher's hands rather than taking the sign internally and writing one's own. 
The lesson is showing what the person has written if read expressively, which is awkward. The second shows the sign written properly expressively. 

Charles Butler

chazzer3332000 at yahoo.com

240-764-5748

Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Tue, 10/25/11, Charles Butler <chazzer3332000 at YAHOO.COM> wrote:

From: Charles Butler <chazzer3332000 at YAHOO.COM>
Subject: Re: AW: (Now yes, you have the video!) A ortografic correction on Facebook!
To: SW-L at LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU
Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 8:49 AM

The video doesn't seem to be talking to the sign spelling that is actually displayed at all.
Watching the video, he seems to be talking about a signing with the left hand across the body where as either of these options is the right hand on the right side of the body. 
Opcao (Option) 1 or 2 are both the same, one is more streamlined than the other but it is still the right hand with the right index finger touching on the cheek and moving down. 

Charles Butler

chazzer3332000 at yahoo.com

240-764-5748

Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Tue, 10/25/11, Valerie Sutton <sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG> wrote:

From: Valerie Sutton <sutton at SIGNWRITING.ORG>
Subject: Re: AW: (Now yes, you have the video!) A ortografic correction on Facebook!
To: SW-L at LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU
Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 1:55 AM

SignWriting ListOctober 24, 2011
The second spelling in the video is a shortened version and the second hand position isn't even written in the second spelling, which suggests to me that the writer feels that it is supposed to be the same handshape and same palm facing in both cases, even though he may not have signed it that way - Just a thought - it is possible that the person who has the sign name wants it to be signed the way
 it is written ... but it is hard to sign it that way!
So Yuri, is the second handshape supposed to be parallel to the Floor or the Wall?



On Oct 24, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Stefan Wöhrmann wrote:
Hi Yuri,  yes I liked to look at your video too. ... and I love all sorts of SW spelling discussions. Part of our SW tests is to search for spelling-mistakes in  GebaerdenSchrift-documents. This is fun and is a wonderful option to improve the skills of a SignWriting scribe. As I understand your video you are discussing the spelling of a name-sign – The letter “D”  for “Danielle” and then focus on the long hair. Right?Well another comment – if you are interested – smile  L.I.F.EWhen I look at your performance and in consideration of the second touch contact at waist level, I would prefer a different notation – the final D-hand with the gap.
  Stefan



On Oct 23, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Yuri Barreto wrote:

Hello friends!

A Sunday rest, but Facebook has emerged as an interesting thingwas reviewing the spelling of a sign written as a way to encouragea deaf friend and other friends, playing SW.

You can laugh!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qY_73oWHbsE

I know that "someone" loves this sort of thing "ephemeral"!
Hugs  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20111025/a4ab8501/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Name_Sign.jpg
Type: image/jpg
Size: 25565 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20111025/a4ab8501/attachment.jpg>