revisiting the book idea

Erika Hoffmann-Dilloway erhoffma at OBERLIN.EDU
Mon Aug 26 18:50:12 UTC 2013


Hi all-

As you may remember, a while back we had a conversation about whether
listmembers would be interested in creating a short SW document for
inclusion in the book I'm working on. What I originally proposed was:

"What if we selected some kind of passage that all of you who were willing
could translate into your respective sign language and write up using SW? I
could devote a chapter of the book to these different texts, which would
allow for a comparison across both different sign languages and different
ways of using SW. Each writer could perhaps reflect on the choices they
made in creating their document, including perhaps how their
backgrounds/goals affect these choices (since some of you are poets, some
linguists, etc). And perhaps participants could also provide their own
thoughts about what we can learn from the comparison of these texts."

We discussed at length what would be the best kind of thing to use as the
prompt for such a passage. It seemed that the thing most agreeable would be
to use a simple image as a prompt, something that would lead to interesting
sentence but not take too much of your time to create. I proposed using the
two images attached here, writing perhaps one or two sentences about each,
for a total of 2-4 sentences.

Well, I just got a prompt from a potential publisher asking when I can give
them a manuscript draft. So I figured I had better re-open the conversation!

Here's what I think would be ideal:

If those of you willing to do so would create brief texts based on the
images and post them to the list. I am interested not only in the texts,
but in the rich conversations about the different languages and writing
styles that this will likely generate. As I wrote to the publisher:

 "I will invite SignWriters to contribute SignWritten texts to the book and
to participate in the analysis of these texts"

 Note that, as this is a linguistic anthropological project, it isn't
necessary to ensure that the texts will be the same - for example, it's
fine if different people write sentences describing different elements of
the picture.

So, what do you think? Shall we try it?

-- 
Erika Hoffmann-Dilloway
Assistant Professor of Anthropology
Oberlin College
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20130826/5cad9758/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Image2frog-where-are-you.png
Type: image/png
Size: 334659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20130826/5cad9758/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Image1frog-where-are-you.png
Type: image/png
Size: 298936 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20130826/5cad9758/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Sw-l mailing list