Evolution to Simplified SignWriting

[Charles Butler]

I have to agree with you. Touching hands to me must TOUCH, actually TOUCH. If you don't know the language and are trying to learn it, you need all the help you can get. 

3 is okay, 1 and 2 actually need a star to be certain. 3 is close enough that I would understand the sign either with the hand touching or not. 

However, in a dictionary, I'm trying to have * followed by ** not what looks like "no touch" followed by "touch twice". Sometimes simple works for quick writing but not for extended study. 

Either way works. 

My current LIBRAS dictionary project is somewhere in the "5" hands and is about 200 pages long. My intent is for people to have an actual printed dictionary of the current LIBRAS corpus by the end of the year. What happens if the power goes down, the CD won't boot up, and you have no access to an i-Phone. A dictionary, a real dictionary, will always be useful. 

Telling people that a videotape or an on-line dictionary is sufficient misses the point of a written language. 
 
Charles Butler
chazzer3332000 at yahoo.com
240-764-5748
Clear writing moves business forward.


________________________________
 From: Valerie Sutton <signwriting at MAC.COM>
To: SW-L at LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU 
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: Evolution to Simplified SignWriting
 


SignWriting List
August 10, 2013

On Aug 10, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Eduardo Trápani <etrapani at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
First of all, I'm just a beginner.  I find this "simplification" a bit confusing, I wouldn't know how to do the sign on the right if I had read it alone. I mean, is it *that* obvious for everybody that the hands are so close that they touch?

Hi Eduardo and Madson -

Eduardo, I can understand your confusion. Let me tell you the story as I know it. We have a writing guideline called "Write the Position of Contact". In other words, we are trying to write signs like they look in real life, as much as possible….Sometimes it is hard to write something exactly as it looks, but most of the time, hands can be placed together and it feels more like the real signs…So the intention is to show the two hands contacting each other… if that is what the sign requires.

So regarding this…. see the attached diagrams. Number 1 does not follow the Position of Contact, because the hands are far apart from each other, and the Touch Star comes between the two hands, so I asked Madson to try to write the hands closer to each other to make it look like real life more... Madson wrote version 2 below, so I asked Adam to ask Madson if we could write the hands even closer to each other, like my version 3, but if I understand it correctly Madson explained that the sign can actually be signed without contact too…and so Madson felt that Number 2 was more accurate showing the hands close but not necessarily touching…

Oftentimes signers sign quickly and they do not always touch in certain signs, and the signs are still understood...

Madson, I appreciate it very much that you went to so much effort - If I have misunderstood anything in my explanation above, you are welcome to correct me - Your new logo is an improvement - it looks nice!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20130811/f010956d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Libras_Escrita.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7508 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20130811/f010956d/attachment.png>