AW: Many

[Stefan Wöhrmann]

Hi Charles, 

 

yes I agree – the hands look good now. On the other hand I am very surprised
to read that you want the reader to understand that your intention is a
“double movement”.

 

I saw this spelling never bevore to indicate a double movement. I would
rather prefer to movement-arrows for each hand. I was wondering and thought
that you focus on rocket-speed writing two dynamic symbols ..;-)

 

All best

 

Stefan 

 

  _____  

Von: SignWriting List: Read and Write Sign Languages
[mailto:SW-L at LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU] Im Auftrag von Charles Butler
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013 12:12
An: SW-L at LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU
Betreff: Re: Many

 


 
<http://www.signbank.org/signpuddle2.0/glyphogram.php?text=AS20300S20300S2f9
00S2f900S2fb00S26600S26610S14c00S14c08S2f720S2f720M29x56S14c006xn36S2fb00n7x
n9S14c08n28xn36S20300n23x31S2030010x31S266009xn2S26610n24xn2S2f900n22x51S2f7
2012xn56S2f720n22xn55S2f90011x51&pad=10&name=many> 
I think this is correct now. The double < on both hands indicates a double
movement. Is there any way to delete the other sign in error. I thought I
was an editor on SignPuddle for ASL. One cannot produce CW's original entry
without error. 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20130224/f4dcf762/attachment.htm>