SignPuddle database design options

[Adam Frost]

To be honest, I have always seen what everyone is calling a classifier here function as a verb rather than a noun or anything else. It is true that classifiers can only work with certain nouns, but it doesn't function as a noun itself.

I agree with the issue of simplicity & usability versus flexibility & exactness. There needs to be a balance between the two sides. That's why I was thinking of having the major categories be static and then having the subcategories be something that people can enter to be able to identify more specifically what the entries are. The other issue is that even the major categories might not fit all sign languages because we don't really know yet. Going static could possibility hurt more than benefit.

Adam

On Jul 3, 2013, at 6:29 AM, Stephen E Slevinski Jr wrote:

> I was wondering about that.  
> * Should classifier be added to the list?
> * Is a classifier only part of a sign?
> * Can classifier fall under another part of speech, such as noun or pronoun?
> 
> -------------------------
> 
> On 7/2/13 9:41 AM, Adam Frost wrote:
>> I think that would be a very good idea for all of the categories to be able to select a subcategory to say specifically what type of verb, noun, etc.
> Hi Adam,
> 
> I'm torn by simplicity & usability versus flexible & exact.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20130703/e4aa5c3b/attachment.htm>