iron: /@r/ vs syllabic /r/
Aaron E. Drews
aaron at LING.ED.AC.UK
Mon Aug 14 11:23:12 UTC 2000
>RP is underlyingly whatever it is, but it is surfacely non-rhotic
>except in environments
>that yield a linking rhotic realization. Larry and I say "Bring back SPE!!!"
I suppose you mean 'linking' as in phonological sandhi.
Traditionally, there has been a distinction between 'linking-r' and
'intrusive-r', the linking phenomenon being in historic/orthographic
instances of (r), and intrusive-r being the Cuber is and drawring.
And RP isn't consistently 'rhotic' in a linking realisation. It
fluctuates because of social stigma.
As for SPE, it has a lot going for it, but I don't like the idea that
I'm carrying around pre Great Vowel Shift phonology in my head. I
have enough problems coping with three (major) varieties of English
on a daily basis.
Aaron E. Drews The University of Edinburgh
http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~aaron Departments of English Language and
aaron at ling.ed.ac.uk Theoretical & Applied Linguistics
Bide lang and fa fair \\ //
More information about the Ads-l