Pragmatics of authors-name order

RonButters at AOL.COM RonButters at AOL.COM
Tue Feb 24 17:03:48 UTC 2004

In a message dated 2/24/04 11:58:28 AM, lesa.dill at WKU.EDU writes:

<< In scientific publications, the norm is that the primary investigator's
name is
listed last.  >>

Is this written down somewhere, or are you just reporting your intuitions?
(Not that the reporting of intuitions is bad--it is just important to know what
the source is for such judgments.)

More information about the Ads-l mailing list