Choral vs. coral

Paul Johnston paul.johnston at WMICH.EDU
Tue Jun 20 18:50:20 UTC 2006


Yes, it's fine in the South and South Midland areas, as far as I
know.  Goes back to both the SW English and Ulster/Scots strains of
settlement there, so it should be present in the mountains as well as
the coastal plain, too.

Paul Johnston
On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Matthew Gordon wrote:

> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
> -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Matthew Gordon <gordonmj at MISSOURI.EDU>
> Subject:      Re: Choral vs. coral
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
> Isn't the 'hoarse/horse' distinction still alive in much of the
> South and
> South Midlands at least among middle-aged and older speakers? I have a
> 50-something colleague from the Bootheel of Missouri who has it.
>
>
> On 6/20/06 11:00 AM, "Beverly Flanigan" <flanigan at OHIO.EDU> wrote:
>
>> Cf. the old "hoarse/horse" split--still in New England?  Not
>> generally
>> elsewhere, as far as I know; but Garrison Keillor has it, for some
>> strange
>> reason (Minnesota-born and bred, though I've never heard other fellow
>> Minnesotans have it).
>>
>> Beverly
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list