awoken/woken -- passive/active past participles?

Wilson Gray hwgray at GMAIL.COM
Wed Nov 12 04:24:29 UTC 2008

I essentially agree with you, Joel. But I'd have to consult my old,
high-school "English Grammar" before I could be absolutely certain.
;-) I seem to recall that there were three separate versions, one of
which lacked either a PAST or a PPP and one of which began with a-. Or
something like that.


All say, "How hard it is that we have to die"---a strange complaint to
come from the mouths of people who have had to live.
-Mark Twain

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> Subject:      awoken/woken -- passive/active past participles?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You were wondering where the second question had disappeared
> to?  Here it is, but only peripherally attached to politics.
> Lisa W. Foderado wrote in The New York Times on Thursday, Nov. 6
> ("For Striving 6th Graders, History is Now and Their Future Just
> Changed", page P7):
> "Too tired, perhaps, from having been awoken at midnight to hear the
> news from their tearful mothers."  [The grade in question, in a
> Brooklyn public school, is predominantly Hispanic and black.]
> And later she wrote:
> "The ... principal [asked] why ... their parents had woken them the
> night before."
> I am really confused.
> One past participle for the passive and another for the active?  And
> to me a strange one (or two) at that -- and seeming to prefer an
> irregular to a regular form, which I would think is not the trend.
> The OED tells me "woken" is an adjective, and rare, but Foderano used
> it as a verb form; and that "awoken" is a variant form of the past
> participle of "awake".
> There is "wake", for which "woken" might be a ppl.  But the OED does
> not show a past participle. form, so I guess "wake" is regular and
> its ppl. is "waked".  Would I say "having been waked at midnight", or
> "having been waked up at midnight"?   And "their parents had waked
> them the night before", or "their parents had waked them up the night
> before"?  I don't think so.
> There is also "awake", for which the OED gives "awoke" and "awaked"
> as ppls.   Would I say "having been awoke/awaked at midnight",?   And
> "their parents had awoke/awaked them the night before",?  Again, I
> don't think so, but these are less unspeakable than the previous.
> But I see "awaken" (sense 4: "To arouse from sleep").  No ppl. shown,
> so I assume it is "awakened".  I would say "having been awakened at
> midnight" and "their parents had awakened them the night before".
> What say the list?
> Joel
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society -

The American Dialect Society -

More information about the Ads-l mailing list