thnidu at GMAIL.COM
Mon Jul 20 02:08:45 UTC 2009
ISTM that Victor's point hinges on the perception that the "ever" in "first
ever" always serves to stress that the NP is the absolute first of its kind
in that context. Given that perception, the word's use here overrides the
latitude we normally allow for elliptical headlines(e) and amounts to an
apparent reference to the first Japanese microscope that ever existed.
That's how I read it too.
m a m
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Laurence Horn <laurence.horn at yale.edu>wrote:
> At 6:39 PM -0400 7/19/09, Victor wrote:
> >Just wanted to share this headline:
> >>>Edmonton lab gets first ever Japanese Microscope
> >For me, "first ever" means that it did not exist before. Not so for this
> >Canadian headline--these microscopes have never been built or operated
> >outside of Japan, but they've certainly been in existence in Japan for
> >some time.
> > VS-)
> I'm not sure it has that reading for me, or not exclusively. Given
> that the headline is, I assume, elliptical for "(An) Edmonton lab
> gets its first ever Japanese microscope", and not for "...gets the
> first ever Japanese microscope", it's no odder in principle than
> "Nolan Ryan Pitches Seventh No-Hitter", which would be universally
> interpreted as describing the 7th no-hitter thrown by Ryan, not by
> anyone ever. Or "Elizabeth Taylor Weds 5th Husband". But what of
> "Baby Takes First Steps Ever"? There are 28K "first steps ever"
> hits on google, many of which would lend themselves to such a
> headline (assuming the headline writer is a parent of the child in
> question). Or
> "US inaugurates first black president ever"
> which I think is compatible with there having been black presidents
> of, say, countries in Africa (*its* first, not *the* first, once
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l