KWAL vs. Freq - different output?

Katie Lippitt klippitt at terpmail.umd.edu
Wed Jul 31 13:30:25 UTC 2013


Hello,

I am creating subdivisions for the filled pauses um and uh in CLAN for a 
certain body of data. All of the filled pauses were originally marked @fp. 
I know this is unorthodox but in order to create the subdivisions we are 
going through and adding @l (lexical) @s (syntactic) and @o (other) after 
the @fp. This data is not going to be used for any databases, I just need a 
systematic way to differentiate the filled pauses. 

I have a list of how many filled pauses there are in each transcript and 
I've been using FREQ to make sure that I remarked all of the filled pauses. 
I was surprised that FREQ brought up all three of my categories and any 
filled pauses I missed but the numbers didn't match what I had previously. 
When I KWAL the transcript or find the filled pauses by hand I find the 
right number. 

Is there any reason that KWAL and FREQ wouldn't match? 

I did re-download CLAN and try again. 
I've been searching with the command freq +sum*  +suh* in order to get all 
my post codes. 

Thanks,
Katie

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "chibolts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chibolts+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to chibolts at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chibolts/dca18c29-2122-48e1-951e-a4f87c0c0b0a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/chibolts/attachments/20130731/3fdc2b06/attachment.html>


More information about the Chibolts mailing list